Our page on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/Army.Commander.And.LeaderMuammarGaddafi

NATO Humanitarian Operation

NATO IS A WAR CRIMINAL

NATO gifts for the children of Libya Part 1&2 THE SORMAN KILLING

NATO and the UN must take responsibility for civilian deaths in Libya

Of how the West won in Libya

by  Pepe Escobar

Since the beginning of the NATO operations against Gaddafi‘s Libya and its socialist and anarchist system,  the Western business press has not stopped a moment to misinform and alter reality . But it is only because of the enormity of the lie conveyed by the trade press, unanimous in his speech, that little by little, the truth is emerging in all this slander and manipulation. All this thanks to the work of researchers, thinkers and honest journalists, whose logic, analysis, instruct us and show us the dark side of the Libyan tragedy.

Libyan capital Tripoli under NATO bombs, the massive bombing of NATO have killed thousands of innocent civilians and the trade press has never said anything about it.

They fight like vultures on the bodies. The French defense minister said he had been seized with a Rafale fighter jet that fired on the convoy in which he-(…) The Pentagon said it had seized a missile firing  Hellfire  from a Predator. 
Then a wounded Colonel Muammar Gaddafi sought refuge in a filthy sewer under a highway, a creepy echo  “hole” of Saddam Hussein - which was found by the ‘rebels’ National Transitional Council (NTC), who, unsurprisingly, he was executed.

Abdel-Jalil Abdel-Aziz, a doctor who accompanied the Libyan Qadhafi’s body in an ambulance and who examined him said he died from two bullets, one in the chest and once in the head.

The NTC, which has been selling lies, lies and more lies for months, swears he died in a “crossfire”. Maybe it was a mob. Maybe it was Mohammad al-Bibi, who wore a baseball cap to the  Yankees  in New York and who posed for the whole world the golden gun wielding Gaddafi, perhaps to collect your ticket the considerable sum of $ 20 million offered as prizes by Gaddafi “dead or alive.”

Everything is becoming more curious when one remembers that this is exactly what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in his meteoric visit to Tripoli forty-eight hours before Gaddafi would be “captured or killed.” The  Fairy Queenie  [ 1 ] satisfy  the wishes of Clinton, who learned of the facts by looking at the screen of a BlackBerry , and reacting to the earthquake semantic “WOW.”

For the winners, the spoils. All they did: the Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Pentagon and the NTC. At the time that a United Nations resolution imposing a no-fly zone over Libya became a permission to change the regime, the plan was always to capture him and kill him. Targeted killing, that’s the official policy of the Obama administration. There was no plan B.

Let me protect you by bombing you!!!

As for the R2P (“responsibility to protect” civilians), any skeptic should cling to the explanation of the NATO secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen:  “NATO and our partners have successfully launched a historic mandate of United Nations to protect the people of Libya “ . 
Anyone who wants to review the NATO protection to civilians only need to jump into a van and reached up to Sirte, the new Fallujah.

Reactions have been very instructive. The NTC bureaucrat Ghoga Abdel went to the Coliseum of the Roman Empire and said,  “The revolutionists have the head of the tyrant” .

U.S. President  Barack Obama  said Gaddafi’s death means that “we’re seeing the strength of American leadership around the world.” That’s how to “grab him” everything one could expect, considering that Washington paid no less than 80% of the cost of the operation of these ceporros of NATO (about 1,000 million dollars, which the squatters of Wall Street would do well to report because they could have been dedicated to creating jobs in the U.S.). How strange that now “we did it” because the White House always said that this was not a war, it was something “kinetic”.And they would not charge.

It seems like the majestic foreign policy strategist, U.S. Vice President Jo Biden, who was more instructive than Obama starkly:  “In this case, the U.S. has spent 2,000 million dollars and has not lost a single life. This is a good recipe on how to deal with the world to advance faster than we did in the past “ .

World, be warned, this is how the rule will henceforth treat.

Feels about my love as humanitarian

How many innocent civilians are killed by NATO in Libya?

By  ISHAAN THAROOR

When the Organization North Atlantic Treaty (  NATO  ) meets next week at a summit in Chicago, expect a lot of self-congratulatory rhetoric about bombing campaign of the alliance in Libya last year.  With the support of a mandate Security Council of the UN, NATO defendants, citing his “  responsibility to protect  “civilians threatened by looting the bloody end of Libyan tyrant  Muammar Gaddafi  .  about 26,000 outlets The bombing released from vessels NATO helped push back the forces of Gaddafi, attacks in the arsenals of the regime and the defenses allowed rebel fighters to sweep the floor, finally, in Tripoli and deliver the coup government of martyr Gaddafi.  Not much later, the conspirators, former French president  , Nicolas Sarkozy  and British Prime Minister David Cameron, they were greeted as heroes strident in Tripoli and Benghazi.

With the end game in Afghanistan dragging along and financial problems dogging many NATO member states, the relative success of the mission to Libya leaves the grand old alliance feel good about himself.  But then read  the question  recently posed by a Libyan, “I just need a response from NATO: Why destroy my house and kill my family?”

This phrase, attributed to Faiz Fathi Jfara of the city of Bani Walid, appears in a  report by Human Rights Watch  released this week entitled “The deaths are not recognized.” The report lists eight specific incidents in which at least 72 Libyan civilians were killed as a result of NATO bombing campaign.  A third of the victims were children under 18.  HRW researchers found the remains of a laser-guided missile in the ruins of the family home Jfara, where five family members, including a nine-year-old died when the bombs fell on 30 August.

As the report emphasizes the fact NATO took significant steps to limit civilian casualties during operations in Libya.  And the Gaddafi regime has played and sometimes theatrical incidents of collateral damage as propaganda the last breath of their war effort flag.  In response to the report by Human Rights Watch, NATO issued a  statement  , an excerpt below, emphasizing the care taken to safeguard civilian life:

This was the first air campaign in history that only precision-guided munitions were used.  NATO approached each individual decision guidance with extraordinary caution. ?! We had solid intelligence ?!(** from Twitter) and a process of strict targeting. ?!(** from Twitter and the coordination’s were given from Twitter its documented)On of the week, time of day or night, or even the direction of attack were considered carefully to minimize the risk of civilian casualties.  ?!We conducted 9,700 strike missions and dropped more than 7,700 precision bombs, but no target has approved or beaten if we had any reason to believe that civilians are in danger. Whenever possible, we used the weapon with the lowest performance to prevent damage or injury.  In some cases, as many as 50 hours video observation airborne was performed and analyzed before a strike was authorized.  Hundreds of attacks were aborted at the last moment because of the perceived possibility of a civilian presence.(*** that’s a total bull they are lying because at one point were they bombed a house with a family and neighbors run to help the injured the planes came back and bombarded the place to the ground we have the footage they did not want any witnesses. They made a collective punishment to the Libyans because we supported the Libyan Jamahiriya and they bombed homes, hospitals, food storage’s, water storage’s and anything that was moving! All is documented).

However, while expressing regret at the loss of civilian life, NATO has, according to HRW, so far “failed to recognize these victims or examine how and why it happened.” The New York-based group is now urging the rights of proper investigations into these eight separate incidents and called for “prompt and adequate compensation” for families of victims.  The worst case documented by Human Rights Watch conducted in the small town of Majer, south of the disputed city  Zlitan  .  On August 8, a series of NATO bombs fell on a compound here, according to witnesses and residents, was occupied by civilians flee the bombing and fighting in the streets causing havoc in the big cities nearby.  His sanctuary was short-lived, according to HRW, the NATO bombing killed 34 people.  The report quoted one survivor: “The house was full of people who fled the war. All of them were my relatives … We heard the sound of bombing and the power went out of … When I got outside, we started looking for bodies on. “

When pressed recently by Human Rights Watch, NATO said Majer compounds were “legitimate military targets”, but have not provided evidence to prove beyond repeated insistence that “credible allegations” were investigated.

And not just restricted to the calamities caused by a rebel missile.  human rights groups criticized the NATO  in the death of about 62 refugees fleeing the war in Libya in May repeated distress calls from the ship, which was adrift in the Mediterranean, were heard for about NATO vessels.  Tens board died of thirst and hunger.  The consequences of the NATO campaign has proven to be deadly as well: after raids by NATO forces sent Gaddafi in retirement, department stores were opened and weapons were looted by Al Qaeda mercenaries.  Advanced Armament Libya has found its way  to Mali  , where ethnic insurgents twinned with extremists, al-Qaeda, militias linked has sunk a of the most stable democracies in Africa into chaos.  Yes, NATO must be satisfied for breaking international law, violating the sovereignty and encourage the looting of Libya in the most macabre.  But, as their heads of state meet in Chicago next week, the legacy of Libya should provide a moment’s pause, no applause.

The plastic sandals of the dead women, still covered with dust from the rubble, are grouped in a corner.  Joining them are dented a watch, bicycles for children with a tilt wheel and a sewing machine. Disorder Obsessive is there to honor the memory of the victims, but also to show that he did not deserve to be targeted by NATO, there was no reason I should have been mistaken for a “legitimate”.

“You think I have welcomed all these people in my house if Gaddafi soldiers were around the city?” Haj Ali asks.

HRW researchers, who came to inspect the site four times, including the day after the disaster – are backing the declaration of Ali.  Save a camouflage shirt (a garment that many Libyans like to use), they could not find One piece of evidence to support the NATO request Majer farms served as a rest stop for the Libyan army.

In the next room, the mausoleum was converted into a museum of terror.  The walls are covered with pictures of dead bodies, torn.  “This is my brother,” says Adel Absaat, a young man about 30 years.  He points to an image of a body without a shape, covered in blood.  “He was in the mosque when an explosion destroyed the first house Jarood family. With nearly 10 of his friends ran to help the victims.  This is when the second hit attack.  All were killed. “

The villagers have collected bomb fragments in the debris and placed on a wooden table. One of the fragments identified by HRW as a piece of the fin of a GBU-12, a missile with a laser guidance system the pilot should have indicated the presence of a large number of people on the ground, according to the report.

The new government reluctant to criticize NATO

The day after the bloodshed, May 09, the Libyan authorities took a dozen journalists on the scene.  Delighted with the prospect of NATO embarrassing, or even forcing it to suspend operation, the regime’s mouthpiece, Mussa Ibrahim, was a diatribe, describing the crime as “beyond comprehension.”

Ibrahim exaggerated the death toll, citing 85 victims.  Knowing that Gaddafi supporters had a history of official figures playing the violin, the media reported the speech with caution. Torn between anger, pain and reluctance to feed Gadhafi’s arguments, the villagers were silent.  had to wait until the conflict ended before they could start looking for the recognition of the tragedy he had suffered.

However, the National Transitional Council of Libya (NTC), the governing body of the Libyan revolution, is reluctant to take a position on the case.  Some of its members deem appropriate to blame NATO ally whose support was instrumental in overthrowing Gaddafi. ”They say Gaddafi forces carried out [the attacks] themselves to discredit the West,” says Khaled Shakshik, an NTC official Zlitan, a larger city with Majer .  ”Even those who recognize the mistakes of NATO against the idea of calling the victims martyrs.  say that [the victims] were not all necessarily anti-Gaddafi. “

These calculations are maddening petty Milad Tawil, an engineer, whose brother died in the bloodbath.  ”We do not want compensation, as much as we want moral support,” he says. ”We have paid the ultimate price for freedom.  This has to be recognized. “