May 4 2013

Zionists and Gulf Monarchs Ponder Pushing Al Qaeda to Take on Hezbollah

Zionists and Gulf Monarchs Ponder

Pushing Al Qaeda to Take on Hezbollah

by FRANKLIN LAMB

Beirut

“This is one damn fine idea, what took us so long to see a simple solution that was right in front of our eyes for Christ’s sake”, Senator John McCain of “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” and “no-fly zones for Syria” notoriety, reportedly demanded to know from Dennis Ross during a recent Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) brain storming session in Washington DC.

Ross, a founder of WINEP with Israeli government start up cash (presumably reimbursed unknowingly, one way or another by American taxpayers) and currently WINEPs “Counselor”, as in “consigliere” reportedly responded to the idea of facilitating Al Qeada to wage jihad against Hezbollah with the comment: “Shiites aren’t the only ones seeking death to demonstrate their ‘resistance’ to whatever. Plenty of other Muslims also want to die as we saw last week in Boston. Let ‘em all go at it and Israel can sweep out their s— when it’s over.”

One Congressional staffer attending the WINEP event emailed to Beirut: “Dennis spoke in jest—well I assumed he did- but who knows anymore? Things are getting ever crazier inside some of these pro-Israel ‘think tanks’ around here.”

Featured on the front page of its 25/4/13 edition, the Zionist compliant New York Times writes that the Assad regime is apparently recovering but, “it must be understood that for all of the justified worries about the (al Qaeda affiliated) rebels “Assad remains an ally of Iran and Hezbollah.”

The Times adopts the views of Islamophobe, Daniel Pipes, who recommends that the US try to keep the two sides in Syria fighting as long as possible until they destroy each other. Pipes, now serving as an advisor to John McClain, wrote in the Washington Times of 11/4/13 “ Evil forces pose less danger to us when they make war on each other. This keeps them focused locally, and it prevents either one from emerging victorious and thereby posing a greater danger. Western powers should guide enemies to a stalemate by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their debilitating conflict.”

Both Jeffrey Feltman, U.N. Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs and Susan Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the U.N, have at a minimum impliedly joined in the intriguing idea of sic’ing Jabhat al Nusra on the Party of God. This scheme, if launched, would be Feltman’s 14th attempt to topple Hezbollah and defeat the Lebanese National Resistance to the occupation of Palestine since he first arrived in Beirut from Tel Aviv in 2005 to become US Ambassador to Lebanon. This observer, among others in this region sense that given the aura still enveloping the American Embassy here, that Jeffrey never really left his Lebanese ambassadorial post and continues to occupy this position from his new UN office.

This week Feltman warned that the spillover of Syria’s war continues to be felt in Lebanon as Susan Rice, echoed him and condemned Hezbollah for “undermining the country’s “dissociation policy.” The latter being a bit obscure in meaning but connoting something like sitting around doing nothing while this country is being shelled by jihadists from among the 23 countries currently fighting in Syria. Feltman informed the media on 22/4/13 that “The Secretary-General is concerned by reports that Lebanese are fighting in Syria both on the side of the regime and on the side of the opposition, hopes that the new government will find ways to promote better compliance by all sides in Lebanon with the “disassociation policy.”

Given current divisions in Lebanon that will not happen anymore than Lebanon’s June 9th Parliamentary elections will be held on time.

For her part, Susan lectured the UN Security Council that “Hezbollah actively enables Assad to wage war on the Syrian people by providing money, weapons, and expertise to the regime in close coordination with Iran.” This position was expressed also through a statement by US. State Department spokesman, Patrick Ventrell, who said that Washington “has always been clear concerning Hezbollah’s shameful role and the support it is providing for the Syrian regime and the violence it is inducing in Syria.” Ventrell added: “We were clear from the start concerning the destructive role played by Iran as well as the Iranian role.”

Several Israeli agents in Congress are today promoting a Jabhat el Nusra-Hezbollah war even as the Obama administration terror-lists the jihadist group. Meanwhile, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), McCain’s neocon Islamaphobe acolyte, goes a bit further and explains to Fox News, once Assad falls and Hezbollah is out of the picture “We can deal with these (jihadist) fellas.”

Recent history in Libya instructs otherwise. As Turkish commentator Cihan Celik recently noted: “A divorce with al-Nusra will not be easy in Syria.”

The past two years in Libya, that shadow of a country, reveals countless examples, three witnessed firsthand by this observer, during the long hot summer of 2011. What we saw was Gulf sponsors and funders offering young men, often unemployed, $ 100 per month, free cigarettes, and a Kalashnikov to do jihad. Plenty down and out lads still accept these offers in Libya, as they do in Syria. One reason why the militias proliferated so quickly in Libya and never melted away was the phenomenon of a wannabe jihadists deciding to be a leader and recruiting perhaps a brother or two, maybe a few cousins or tribe members, and presto, they have created a militia with power they never dreamed of. Their new life can offer many perceived benefits from running roughshod over the civilian populations and setting up myriad mini but potent criminal enterprises specializing in kidnappings, robberies, drugs, trafficking in women, and assassinations for cash. How many of these young men have turned in their weapons in Libya and returned to their former lives? Or will do so when instructed by the likes of McCain or Graham?

On 24/4/13 Jabhat Al-Nusra Front intensified its threats to officials here including the Lebanese president by releasing a challenge from its media office: “…we inform you – and you may think of that as a warning or an ultimatum – that you must take immediate measures to restrain Hezbollah, otherwise, the fire will reach Beirut. If you do not abide by this within 24 hours, we will consider that you are taking part in the massacres committed by the Hezbollah members and we will unfortunately have to burn everything in Beirut.” In addition they are calling for Jihad and the establishment of the “Resistance Factions for Jihad against the Regime in Syria” and also in Saida and Tripoli, Lebanon.

Israeli officials appear to be in agreement with the Ross/Pipes proposal to arrange for Al Qeada to launch a war against Hezbollah. The Director for External Affairs at “The Mosche Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies, repeatedly claimed that the Shia are the real threat to Israel, not the Sunni and with the least threat coming from the Gulf monarchs. He offered the view recently that “Israel is now a partner of the Sunni Arab states.” Indeed, Israel hopes that Hezbollah will forget Israel when tasked with trying repel Al Nusra and other al Qaeda affiliate attacks.

According to various Israel officials who have issued statements on the subject, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan and several other members of the Arab League constitute an “alliance of anxiety for Israel” because they claim that “Sunni Arabs are not as competent as the Shia and Iran and as a result they express doubts that Israel can rely on the Sunni states in the same way that the Sunni states can reply on Israel.”

In a documentary about the Iraq war, an American soldier explains: “Actually, we don’t really have much of a problem with the Sunnis. It’s the Shias who we are afraid of. The problem has something to do with their leader who was killed centuries ago and these fellas are willing to lay their life down for the guy. Anyhow, that is that they told us in Special Ops class.”

Al Nusra fighters currently occupying parts the south west areas of Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in south Damascus, recently expressed eagerness to fight Hezbollah which they claim would give them credibility with Sunni Muslims and, oddly, in this observers view, “ credibility with western countries”, who supposedly are al Qaeda’s sworn enemies. It’s sometimes hard to know who precisely is whose enemy these days in Syria as the rebels continue using areas east and southwest of Damascus as rear bases and as gateways into the capital.

Despite boasts to the contrary from Jihadist types in Syria and Lebanon, it is not clear to this observer if Jihadist and al Qaeda-affiliated groups living among Hezbollah communities in Lebanon like Fatah al Islam, Jund al Sham or Osbat al Ansar which have been here for years would actually join the Zionist promoted anti-Hezbollah jihad.

But it is evident that some Lebanese Islamists and jihadists directly connected to al Qaeda do have the ability to target Hezbollah. Elements from each of these groups are startling to associate and identify with al Nusra inspired partly by the latter’s successful military operations of Jabhat al Nusra in Syria. Again, we saw the same thing in Libya. Enthusiastic, ambitious young men who want to improve their lot in life try to go with a winner. According to sources in the Ain al Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp, jihadist leaders such as Haytham and Mohammed al Saadi, Tawfic Taha, Oussama al Shehabi and Majed al Majed are recruiting followers and fighters in Lebanon and offer a ticket out the the squalid army surrounded, Syrian refugee inflated camp.

Homs-based media activist Mohammad Radwan Raad claims that “the embattled residents of the rebel-controlled Homs province town of Al-Qusayr welcome Saida, Lebanon based Sunni Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir’s call for Jihad in Syria.” Claims Raad, “Al-Qusayr residents welcome Assir’s call and hope the Lebanese people help kick out Hezbollah members in the area…We need anyone who can get rid of them.” This week Assir urged his followers to join Syrian rebels fighting troops loyal to President Bashar al-Assad and Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah. Al-Qusayr has been under rebel control for more than a year and on the scene reports indicate that it is about to be returned to central government control.

In response, two Salafist Sunni Lebanese sheikhs urged their followers to go to Syria to fight a jihad (religious war) in defense of Qusayr’s Sunni residents. “There is a religious duty on every Muslim who is able to do so… to enter into Syria in order to defend its people, its mosques and religious shrines, especially in Qusayr and Homs,” Sheikh Ahmed al-Assir told his followers. For now, experts say, such calls on the part of Lebanon’s Salafists are largely bluster because the movement is far from able to wield either the arsenal or the fighting forces of Hezbollah.

Local analysts like Qassem Kassir argue that Jabhat al Nusra and friends are not organized enough to fight against Hezbollah in a conventional war, but they could cause great damage by organizing bomb attacks against the Party of God’s bases and militants. The latter would be enough initially for Ross and WINEP and their Zionist handlers. Creating chaos in Lebanon being one of their goals but more importantly weakening the National Lebanese Resistance led by Hezbollah and also challenging Syria and Iran.

In a recent speech, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah offered his party’s view about a promoted Sunni-Shia clash with Al-Nusra, AlQaida and all the groups which flocked to Syria, saying that what was wanted of them by those who sent them was to kill and get killed in Syria, in a massacre which will only serve the enemies of the Arabs and Muslims.

The coming months will reveal to us if the several pro-Zionist Arab regimes and Islamophobes including those at WINEP and other Israel first “think-tanks” are delusional in believing a “simple solution” in John McCain’s words, to those resisting the Zionist occupation of Palestine would be to assist Jabhat el Nusra type jihadists to make war against Hezbollah. And whether they could defeat Hezbollah or even whether Jabhat al Nusra and friends are capable of igniting yet another catastrophe in this region.

Franklin Lamb is doing research in Lebanon and Syria and can be reached c/o fplamb@gmail.com

source: Counterpunch

About these ads

Apr 23 2013

If you Want to go to Heaven, You had Better get Busy Overthrowing Syria

By Paul Craig Roberts

The United States government has been at war for eleven years. The US military destroyed Iraq, leaving the country and millions of lives in ruins and releasing sectarian bloodletting that had been kept in check by the secular Saddam Hussein government. On any given day in “liberated” Iraq, the death toll is as high as during the height of the US attempted occupation.

In Afghanistan eleven years of US attempted occupation has had no more success than a decade of Soviet occupation. The Afghans are still not worn down despite more than two decades of war with the two superpowers. Like the Soviets, the Americans have managed to kill many women, children, and village elders, but precious few warriors. In place of the Soviet puppet government there is Washington’s puppet government. That is the only change, and Washington’s puppet is no more secure than the Soviet one was.

In Libya, Washington used its corrupt NATO puppets and CIA-recruited bandits to overthrow another stable government, that of Muammar Gaddafi, leaving Libya mired in sectarian violence. A stable prosperous country has simply been destroyed by western governments that profess human rights values and condemn China and Russia for not having any.

Washington has also been killing civilians with drones and air strikes in Pakistan and Yemen, two countries with which Washington is not at war but has purchased the governments, paying the Pakistani and Yemeni governments for the right to murder their citizens and destabilizing both countries in the process.

And now in Syria Washington is at work destroying another stable secular government headed by a British trained eye doctor.

Washington’s eleven years of illegal aggression against Muslim countries--war crimes according to the Nuremberg trials of Nazis–have resulted in civilian deaths far in excess of military casualties and in a domestic American police state that has destroyed the rule of law and the constitutional protections of US citizens. Washington and its presstitutes have emphasized that these costs are necessary to save Americans from al-Qaeda terrorists, none of whom have ever been apprehended in the United States.

Having listened to the propaganda line pumped out by Washington and its Ministry of Propaganda for eleven years, imagine my astonishment when I saw two juxtaposed headlines: “Al-Nusra pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda” (BBC) and “Move to Widen Help for Syrian Rebels Gains Speed in West” (NY Times). Al-Nusra is the main military component of the “Syrian rebels,” and it has allied itself with our mortal enemy–Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda.

Wait a minute! Our government told us for eleven years that we blew trillions of dollars on wars to protect Americans from al-Qaeda, endangering Social Security, Medicare, the social safety net, the dollar’s exchange value, the credit rating of the US Treasury, and our civil liberties in order to save America from al-Qaeda terrorists. So why is Washington now supporting al-Qaeda’s overthrow of the secular, non-Islamist government in Syria which has never ever done anything whatsoever to Americans!?

The New York Times presstitutes, Michael R. Gordon and Mark Landler, elevated the terrorist al-Qaeda organization to the status of “the Syrian opposition.” At a lunch meeting hosted by Washington’s puppet, British Foreign Secretary William Hague, and US Secretary of State John Kerry, “the Syrian opposition,” aka al-Qaeda, requested antiaircraft and antitank weapons. A senior Washington official said: “Our assistance has been on an upward trajectory, and the president (Obama) has directed his national security team to identify additional measures so that we can increase assistance.”

US Secretary of State John Kerry announced a $123 million “defense aid package” to “the Syrian opposition” that now includes al-Qaeda. Washington had already sent $117 million in “food and medical supplies” to “the Syrian opposition,” and ordered its Middle Eastern puppets to send arms. Note the Orwellian language: support for an outside terrorist force seeking to destroy a government and a people is called a “defense aid package.”

On April 11 the establishment French newspaper, Le Monde, reported that the al-Nosra organization affiliated with al-Qaeda is the dominant force in “the Syrian opposition,” not democratic revolutionaries. Despite this fact, Washington’s puppets, France and Britain, are pushing the European Union to send arms to the al-Qaeda affiliated “Syrian opposition.” And Senator John McCain wants US airstrikes on Syrian government forces with whom the US is not at war, in order to provide air cover for al-Qaeda’s takeover of Syria.

Meanwhile, the Islamist Shiites, whom the Americans left in control of Iraq, have announced that they have joined the battle against the American-supported al-Qaeda forces seeking to radicalize Syria.

So far at last count, the UN reports that the military attack on Syria organized by Washington’s proxies has killed 70,000 people. But americans are preoccupied with the Boston Marathon bombing, which killed 3.

Once again “the indispensable people” are bringing death and destruction to an entire country in order to bring to the dead “freedom and democracy.” No Syrian asked for this “liberation” from his life.

Be a Proud American. We are doing our duty to our rightful hegemony over the world and to Israel, which has purchased our government. It is our right to be the hegemonic power on the planet earth, and that includes the Mediterranean Sea. Therefore it is Washington’s right to overthrow Syria in order to get rid of the Russian naval base there. The Romans would never have put up with a foreign power having a naval base in the Mediterranean, and we can do no less, unless we are some kind of pansy state afraid of our own shadow. The Mediterranean was mare nostrum–our sea–for the Romans. Now it is our sea, and by god we are going to claim it by overthrowing Syria.

Israel, of course, was given the rights to “Greater Israel” by God himself–who am I to question the Christian Zionist preachers who are growing fat on Israeli money–and part of “Greater Israel” is the river in southern Lebanon that supplies precious water.

Hizbollah, provisioned by Syria and Iran has prevented Israel from confiscating southern Lebanon in order to acquire the water rights that God gave them. Therefore, to fulfill our obligations as Israel’s puppet, we are required to destroy both Syria and Iran so that Hizbollah is isolated and out of the way and “Greater Israel” can be created.

The Christian Zionist churches in the US repeat this message every Sunday. If you don’t believe it, you are some kind of anti-american anti-semite and should be exterminated. Or you could be a despicable Muslim terrorist to be waterboarded into confession. Homeland Security will make short work of you just like they did to those Russian Muslim terrorists in Boston who tried to blow up the Marathon race.

I mean, really, how can we indispensable people bring freedom and democracy to the world if the Russians have a naval base in our sea? How can we project strength if we project such weakness by permitting a foreign power’s presence in our exclusive sphere of influence many thousands of miles away from our borders. Don’t forget, America’s borders are the world’s borders. It says so in our song–”From sea to shining sea.” Don’t forget it.

Of course, we don’t want to go head-to-head with another well armed nuclear military power, but the way around that is to demonize the Syrian government and Russia for supporting an eye doctor who is “a brutal dictator” who is resisting an Islamist al-Qaeda takeover of Syria financed by Washington. Our masters in Washington can use the UN and all our well-paid puppet states to pressure the Russians to shut up and get out of our way. I mean, really, does Putin want all those Russian NGOs that we finance to bring their operatives out onto the streets in Moscow and bring down his government? I mean, really, who does Putin think he is standing up to our god-given hegemony over the world, much less Israel’s god-given hegemony over the Middle East? I mean, Putin is in for it, and so are those goddamn Chinese. I mean, really, who do they think they are? Americans? Don’t those Chinks know about our control of the Pacific? I mean, really, are they out to lunch?

And, I mean, really, how can all us get to heaven if we don’t do God’s will and deliver the Middle East to Israel as Israel says the scriptures require. I mean, really, do you want to oppose God and burn in hell? Instead of all those virgins Muslims promise you, you will be devoured by fire. You better get on the right side before you die.

I mean, really, who wants this fate. We had better get rid of Syria sooner than ordered.
If we don’t do what Israel tells us God requires, we are finished. That’s for sure.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal.

source: Information Clearing House

Mar 15 2013

An Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in his Speeches

THE EVIDENCE IS HERE: This document contains over 60 pages of evidenc and analysis proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.

Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s speeches intentionally contain:

Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them. This document examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients. Obama’s mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest leader of a generation” who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires” by giving speeches. Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.

Obama is not just using subliminal messages, but textbook covert hypnosis and neuro-linguistic programming techniques on audiences that are intentionally designed to sideline rational judgment and implant subconscious commands to think he is wonderful and elect him President. Obama is eloquent. However, Obama’s subconscious techniques are shown to elicit powerful emotion from his audience and then transfer those emotions onto him, to sideline rational judgment, and implant hypnotic commands that we are unaware of and can’t even consciously question. The polls are misleading because some of Obama’s commands are designed to be triggered only in the voting booth on November 4th. Obama is immune to logical arguments like Wright, Ayers, shifting every position, character, and inexperience, because hypnosis affects us on an unconscious and emotional level. To many people who see this unaccomplished man’s unnatural and irrational rise to the highest office in the world as suspicious and frightening and to those who welcome it, this document uncovers, explains, and proves the deceptive tactics behind true “Obama Phenomenon” including why younger people are more easily affected.

- Trance Inductions
- Hypnotic Anchoring
- Pacing and Leading
- Pacing, Distraction and Utilization
- Critical Factor Bypass
- Stacking Language Patterns
- Preprogrammed Response Adaptation
- Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges
- Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded Suggestions
- Emotion Transfer
- Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming

AN EXAMINATION OF OBAMA’S USE OF HIDDEN HYPNOSIS TECHNIQUES IN HIS SPEECHES EXPOSING OBAMA’S DECEPTION MAY BE THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY

READ THIS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Skeptics will surely doubt the information provided in this document with four specific oppositions – each of which this document disproves.

Foreword and commentary

PART 1 – HYPNOSIS BASICS

You must understand the basics of Ericksonian hypnosis to see what Obama is doing.

Real “hypnosis”explained.
Two separate definitions of “hypnosis.
The origins of “covert hypnosis” and “conversational hypnosis” aka “black ops” hypnosis.
Bypassing the dominant hemisphere’s rational judgment (“critical factor”).

PART 2 – WHAT OBAMA IS ACTUALLY DOING

Obama’s actions are far more deceptive than simply lying.
The study of the effects of mass hypnosis.
Illegality of Obama’s use of hypnosis .
The hypnosis technique of “pacing and leading” to sideline rational judgment.
How pacing is done:.
Specific examples of Obama using 14 separate hypnotic pacing statements in his Denver 2008
Convention speech.
Embedded and hidden meanings – “deep structure” of language vs “surface structure”.
How Ericksonian “linking statements” mimic the way the brain accepts information .
Basics of Obama’s pacing and leading: The “because we need change, that is why I should be your next president” argument .
Obama’s speeches as one big hypnotic trance induction using extra slow speech, rhythm, tonalities,
vagueness, visual imagery, metaphor, and raising of emotion .
The use of Ericksnian “vagueness” in speech as a linguistic induction tool: “Change” and “Yes we can.”

Use of visual imagery and imagination as an induction tool.
The stacking of hypnotic language patterns in 40+ minute long speeches.
Obama’s unusual use of hand gestures as subconscious programming and hypnotic anchoring designed to be triggered in the voting booth on November 4th.
*Obama’s hypnotic command that “a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, ‘I have to vote for Barack’”.

An example of Obama using both of these hypnotic hand gestures, hypnotic programming followed by hypnotic anchor back to back, in a way that can be nothing other than hypnosis.
Undeniable evidence that this is hypnosis: Obama hypnotically anchoring the statement about a light shining down and an internal voice saying “I have to vote for Barack.
Convincing without logic: “The Fierce! Urgency! of Now!” argument (Obama caught anchoring) .
Obama caught in subconscious hand gesture linking McCain to Bush.
Obama caught using one-finger subconscious hand gesture regarding Hillary.
Obama caught in another undeniable subconscious hand gesture regarding McCain.

PART 3 – WHAT OBAMA IS EXACTLY DOING – SPECIFIC SPEECHES “PLAY BY PLAY”.

Obama’s California Democratic Convention speech 2007 – a “play by play” of his undeniable use of
embedded commands, hypnotic induction, and hypnotic storytelling.Obama performs an undeniable Ericksonian hypnotic induction: Obama’s “Turn the Page” Speech at
the California Democratic Convention in 2007.
Obama caught intentionally controlling pace in obvious attempt to maintain trance.
Obama’s speech Tuesday after primaries ended June 3, 2008 – undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of
hypnotic principles of anchoring, deletion, distraction, and leading.
Obama caught delivering another powerful hypnotic command.
Obama caught pacing and leading again .
Obama’s 2007 California Democratic Convention “turn the page” speech – further analysis.
Obama using “turn the page” as a preprogrammed response.
Obama using “turn the page” as a hypnotic anchor:.
Obama’s Democratic Convention speech 2008 – A “play by play” of his undeniable and extensive
anchoring, pacing, leading, and delivery of subconscious commands .
Obama’s typical pacing, leading, storytelling, and hidden meanings induction.
Obama caught stacking language patterns.
*Obama caught clarifying his hand gesture as unmistakable hypnotic anchor of writing with pen
(twice).
Obama caught giving the primary hypnotic command of the speech.
Obama’s aggressive pointing- the subconscious signal of giving commands:.
Obama caught in another hypnotic command, anchor, and a strategic pause.
Obama caught hypnotically linking himself with John F. Kennedy:.
Obama again pacing and leading .

PART 4 – ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF OBAMA’S HYPNOSIS.

Obama’s technique of head turned to the right side in interviews described by body language expert as one of the most powerful subconscious manipulation techniques possible by a speaker’s body language .

Interview of Professor of Psychiatry on CNN in which Dr. comes close to hinting of her suspicion that
Obama is using covert subconscious techniques throughout his campaign.
Hypnosis/NLP expert discusses Obama’s use of mind control techniques on radio.
Website analyzes Obama’s use of hypnosis in speeches .
Obama uses hypnotic command to dismiss the Rev Wright questions.
Obama’s speech on race March 18, 2008 Philadelphia – hypnotic storytelling throughout.
Obama’s hypnotic logo.
Obama’s strange hand gesture & hand-holding conversation with Senator Lieberman.
Obama’s use of a fake presidential seal.
Assorted other points.

PART 5 – THE VISIBLE EFFECTS OF OBAMA’S HYPNOSIS.

The effects of his hypnosis are undeniable.
Obama’s perceived greatness.
Obama’s trance.
The effects of Obama’s hypnosis on young people, and more educated people.
Conclusion and commentary.

Personal Notes:.

Skeptics will surely doubt the information provided in this document with four specific oppositions – each of which this document disproves. These certain oppositions answered in this document are:

1. Hypnosis isn’t real – hypnosis wouldn’t / doesn’t work on me Trance states of mind and enhanced suggestibility happen to everyone every day; driving in your car, in the elevator, watching T.V., or listening to music. This mild hypnotic state is all that is needed for Ericksonian techniques to implant hypnotic commands you are unaware of.

2. Obama isn’t intentionally using mass hypnosis
This document contains over a hundred examples of Obama’s specific language patterns and hypnosis techniques that follow textbook Ericksonian principles and characteristics too much to be coincidence.
3. Obama’s popularity is not attributable to his use of hypnosis
Young people and more educated people actually have lower hypnotic subconscious suggestibility
thresholds for scientific reasons explained. Popular perceptions of Obama are provable as inconsistent with his accomplishments, history, background, and even what is heard from him consciously – however, they match perfectly with the messages he is caught sending intending to be received only subconsciously. People are admittedly mesmerized by him. The irrational rise to power of and uncanny passionate support for a logically unaccomplished and questionable man based on his speaking alone like the “Obama phenomenon” is widely accepted – only the rational explanation for it is missing. Finally, he would not continue to use these deceptive techniques if he did not believe they work.
4. There is nothing unethical about Obama’s use of hypnosis
The techniques used by Obama are the most deceptive forms of communication known to man. They
sideline rational judgment and implant subconscious commands that change how people feel and behave without any awareness of the manipulation. Obama’s techniques overcome the will without convincing the judgment through trickery. Obama often says one message that you are aware of, meanwhile implants a different message hypnotically with double or hidden meanings. He conjures up emotions by talking about your children, and JFK, and then is caught transferring those feelings onto him with hidden hand gestures. He hides what he is doing and brazenly uses these techniques in front of millions of people over and over. Once explained, Obama’s actions can be shown to be the height of manipulation and deception.

IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT YOU READ THIS
DOCUMENT IN ORDER, FROM BEGINNING TO END, AS
DEFINITIONS ARE BUILT ON TOP OF ONE-ANOTHER, AND
UNDERSTANDING OF THESE DEFINITIONS IS NECESSARY.

Foreword and commentary

The level of deception involved in Obama’s use of covert hypnosis, and his presumption that he has the right to use hypnosis on us to gain votes is just unconscionable. It is not a connection to another person that he can deny. It is Obama’s own highly deceptive actions, provable once explained, on video, playable over and over. Obama is sidelining rational judgment and using undue influence to win over voters applying psychological subconscious manipulation like never before in American history.
No other argument against Obama can fundamentally change the way people feel about him deep down inside, EXCEPT, proof that precisely the way they feel about him deep down inside is because of Obama’s own deception and use of hidden hypnosis. This is because exposing Obama’s use of hypnosis takes the people who are entranced by him subconsciously and emotionally, and puts the issue of why they feel that way on a conscious rational level where they can analyze it. It is the one thing that can fundamentally change the game, and shatter Obama’s magical immunity to all of his other faults, logical disqualifications, and deceptions. This can include the media changing their mind about Obama once they see who he really is and also helping to expose what Obama is doing in the interests of democracy. Many people do wake up from the effects of hypnosis once you tell them they have been hypnotized and explain what has happened to them. To a lot of people, it is just a missing piece of the puzzle that makes everything else make sense – almost as if it were the missing piece they were somehow even looking for on some level.

source:http://theyellowbrickroadfreeblog.wordpress.com/

Feb 27 2013

U.S. is deploying a SECRET ARMY IN AFRICA

Saturday, October 20, 2012

The U.S. secret war is alive and well. In addition to his military command in Africa (AFRICOM), U.S. special forces have been deployed across the continent:

“Small teams of special forces arrived at U.S. embassies around the North Africa during the months before that some fighters undertake the fierce attack that killed the ambassador [U.S.] in Libya. The soldiers’ mission: to establish a network that could quickly attack a terrorist target or rescue a hostage “(Kimberly Dozier, White House widens covert ops Presence in North Africa, AP, October 2, 2012).

U.S. is deploying a underground army across Africa. As reported by Nile Bowie (Global Research, April 2012), the goal is to “balkanized” the African continent: “In an AFRICOM Conference held at Fort McNair on February 18, 2008 Vice Admiral Robert T. Moeller openly declared the guiding principle of AFRICOM is to protect “the free flow of natural resources from Africa to the global market”, before citing the growing Chinese presence in the region with a challenge to U.S. interests.

In 2007 adviser to the U.S. State Department Dr. J. Peter Pham spoke about AFRICOM’s strategic goals of “protecting access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources which Africa has in abundance, a task which includes ensuring against the vulnerability of those natural riches and ensuring that no other interested third-party such as China, India, Japan or Russia, obtain monopolies or preferential treatment “(Nile Bowie, COVERT OPS IN NIGERIA: Fertile Ground for U.S. Sponsored Balkanization, Global Research, April 11, 2012). fraud of the “war against terrorism “serves to conceal the destabilization of Africa with the idea of controlling its resources. In the 1990s destabilized the Balkans for the same purpose: In the game of lies: the Great Powers, Yugoslavia, NATO and the next wars, Michel Collon explains how both destabilized the Balkans “to control routes pipelines, dominate Eastern Europe and Russia weaken and master “to” insure [the establishment of] military bases [in Eastern Europe and the Balkans] “(Michel Collon, The game of lies: the Great Powers, Yugoslavia, NATO and the next wars, Hondarribia, Hiru, 1999 *).

Happening in the Middle East is a similar process, in a vast geographic region: “In July 2010 Syria, Iran and Iraq signed an agreement on a pipeline it plans to join the Iran’s South Pars field (the largest in the world) with Syria and, therefore, with the Mediterranean Sea. Near Homs, Syria, discovered another important field, which could become an alternative center of power brokers opposed to passing through Turkey and other routes controlled by European and U.S. companies “(Manlio Dinucci, L’art de la guerre. Syrie: l’Otan will gazoduc vise, October 9, 2012). U.S. Army resort to clandestine drone war to guarantee control of African resources. Although the United States and its allies have funded and supported materially mercenaries linked to al-Qaeda to overthrow the Libyan government and is operating in the same way in Libya, we are told that “the campaign against terrorism indicates that the administration [U.S.] will been concerned for some time the growing threat posed by al-Qaeda and its affiliates in North Africa “(Dozier, op.cit.) Although the Pentagon said that “at this time there are no plans for unilateral U.S. military operations “the article says the opposite of what is expected to Africans unilateral drone war: “The Delta Force group will form the core of a military detachment responsible for fighting al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups throughout the region with an arsenal that includes drones. But first work to gain acceptance helping North African nations to create their own special operations and counterterrorism units “(Ibid.) The hypocritical speech reproduced below indicates the “free flow of natural resources to the global market” and “ access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources “will be protected under the pretext of the” war on terror “: “The Obama administration is concerned about the growing power and influence over the affiliates of al-Qaeda in Yemen, Somalia, Iraq and North Africa. So far, only the Yemeni branch has tried to attack the U.S. with a series of frustrated bomb attack aircraft for the United States. A U.S. Navy SEAL ** detachment established in 2009 has used a combination of airstrikes and drones to fight fighters in Yemen and Somalia working with the CIA and local forces. Detachment’s new work in the same way to fight groups affiliated with al-Qaeda in North Africa, which are increasing and have plenty of weapons from the arsenals looted from Libya after the revolution. Are generously funded by a criminal network that traffic in drugs and hostages. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM (for its acronym in English) and based extremist sect Boko Haram in Nigeria are arguably the two biggest and most dangerous branches . A senior U.S. Department of State for African Affairs said Tuesday that `we must treat Mali militants by security and military means’” (Ibid.) And although we are told that “at this time no plans unilateral U.S. military operations, “Johnnie Carson, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for African affairs, seems to contradict this statement by stating that” any military action here should be well planned, organized, equipped and thought “and, how thoughtful!, “should be agreed between all those who will be most affected by it.” (Ibid.)

Last Updated on Saturday, 16 February 2013 16:20

source: leonorenlibia.com

Nov 13 2012

What happens in Syria???

(****this was forwarded to me by a friend although he is Christian Orthodox and I am Muslim we both have nothing to divide. We both respect each other views about our religion, so I think its worth reading it as he has done a great job collecting all the data. The only thing I did is translate and keep his name anonymous for obvious reasons)

Another look at current happenings in Syria. An interesting text which circulates, despite LIST OF DEFECTS, (spelling and syntax errors. Text style etc)

The media broadcast news about persecution of Christians in Syria.
For a year in Syria is something like … Civil War.

In fact, the U.S., England, France, Israel and other Western, finance Islamist fanatics, who obviously are armed to overthrow the current leader of the Syrian Assad.
It does not mean that Assad himself has not up to now authoritarian rule.
But with a difference.
Assad and the Baathist regime, fully respected Orthodoxy that exists in Syria.

Syria belonged to the Byzantine Empire.

Dozens of monasteries, preserved and in operation today were built then, such is famous for its miracles monastery of Panagia Sentanagia.

What Americans call “Arab Spring”, there seems to be nothing other than the power to impose fundamentalist Muslims, who make Syria western protectorate, as has been Saudi Arabia, Kuwait etc and of course recently Iraq and Libya.

What about the 2.5 million Christians, of which 1 million Orthodox Christians living in Syria means, at best, persecution, moved up to slaughter, which have already begun.

Remember that Gaddafi was true monarch had secured but per capita income for the people of multiple other Arab countries nationalized mineral wealth and an independent monetary policy by the Central Bank of Libya, which managed the Libyan gold (in Greece Bank of Greece privately owned with confidential recommendation portfolio).

Westerners would probably intervene in Syria by NATO air strikes etc but Russia keeps in Tartus, Syria major naval port with full coverage antiaircraft S-300 PMU, TOR-M1 etc which is operated by Russians themselves.

Indeed, some blogs have air that Turkish IDs grabbed two missiles of S-300 in photo identification effort.

On the other and of course China and Iran seem to be reground fine supports Assad.

If they, namely Russia, China and Iran withdraw their support Assad in a matter of hours to Westerners Entering to lynch and enforce their own government-Banana.

Do not forget that Syria is in the fourth grade Patriarchate of Antioch that is based in Damascus.

These light that we see on channels with monks, priests etc are Orthodox fathers and brothers who call themselves Rum from the Greeks, are the descendants of the Byzantines and did not betray their faith when Syria was conquered by the Arabs.

Furthermore let me remind you that Al Qaeda, yes known terrorist organization made in USA, said that 600 members are battling against Assad, that work for the U.S., Israel, etc.

I would remind you that in 1974 it is said that the father of Assad had disposed the military airports to Greece to refuel the Greek fighters to defend Cyprus.
Of course the then government did not exploit the offer of Syria.

Needless to say that the U.S. and Israel are pushing the direct interruption of television channels that broadcast events from the perspective of Assad.
Needless to say that Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries will block the satellite support these channels via satellites occupy themselves.
Needless to say that the director of Obama’s national security leadership of the effort disinformation against Assad crafting the tale that will Entering as saviors of a dictator like Saddam and Gaddafi.
Needless to say about the role of Israel’s Mossad, the destabilizing role and setting up wholly owned states around Israel (Egypt, Libya, Syria, Iran) all now? Coincidence is it?

It is needless to say that the Golan Heights occupied by the Israelis from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War annexed by normally first, secure the 1/3 of the water of Israel and will not spoil them all to attach something else reground fine regions by Syria … cantons.
Needless to say that with all those directly served the Zionist club.
Is superfluous to say that experts in psychological warfare and the control of the masses behind the pro-Western Syria channels just like in Greece to peddle memorandum, selling off public property, selling off mineral wealth etc.

Let’s see some posts:

Here you see a video of many truths about what really happens. Speaking Orthodox Syrians and Imam Muslim who confesses that indirectly knows fanatical Muslims who provoke Assad, the unknown, etc.

Christians Syrian Orthodox in their overwhelming majority, constitute 10% of the total population, living in harmony with others for centuries. Indeed, the Patriarchate of Antioch is one of the 4 “grandfather” of the Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople together with, Jerusalem and Alexandria.

So the Jew-Americans want to destroy the Orthodox population in the country in order to make Islamic standards protectorate of Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other regimes – pawns of the Zionists: Obstacle in these plans are the Syrian Orthodox.

Their major problem, however, is the dynamic presence of the Russians in the region. Maybe that’s why “sent” them … useful idiots cause Turks to the test: The results, all we know.

Here you will see British and American friends reporters say … now … see agents are self-adhesive with alleged rebels against Assad.

What is happening in Syria and what they are trying to show the media World Order?

In the photo journalists of the “Sunday Times” Marie Colvin and Paul Conroy, posing with wanted terrorists, obviously agents of the CIA and the MI6
_______________
is located in Kalintigia Homs in Syria. antiregime The rebels gather in a building Christians and Alevis hostages and THE blown up with dynamite.
Following charge-crime Syrian Army, defiance and the testimony of so many eyewitnesses.
Who writes them? Assad a man? No. It is the testimony of a Munich the depositors or mother Agnes – Mary of the Cross, IN French-language website of neighboring monastery St. James. Nobody but you do not ‘discover’ …

And reproduce them but someone, what would you change? Na, eg The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung wrote arrangements for the slaughter of 90 in Houla how he did against rebels in Alevi and Shiite supporters of Assad: Sunni insurgents attacked the barricade that had set up the Syrian army to protect their Alevi villages.
battle lasted or half an hour and was deadly. Slaughtered women belong to Sunni family that had converted TO siitism, in another that was considered but Sunni collaborators status and other Shiite Family, as stated in the Dutch journalist Martin Jansen survivors fled to the aforementioned monastery.

Nevertheless, Within a few days of journalistic reference for Houla, USA, France, UK, Germany and other Western diplomats expelled Syrians in token “protest”. Complete, ie, confirmation of blatant provocation. So, while he’s decades of quiet life of 2.4 million Christians marching towards the finish (as happened in Iraq when “liberated” from Saddam), another massive crime organized, to the desertification of an Arabic country, despite the reactions of the Russians (who sold attack helicopters in Damascus and launched intercontinental missile submarine in the Mediterranean!)

But how are all these? Thierry Meuse during the campaign of disinformation and war through the media has been undertaken by Benjamin Rhodes, National Security Council White House communications strategy.
shall coordinate the effort for internal collapse now Syria and coup (after The attitude of Putin rather prohibits the attacker). It is a matter of days blocked channels Syrian television and replaced with energizing the CIA. Already the Arab League has formally requested by the operators of Nilesat and Arabsat satellites to quit all Syrian media, government and non (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV …), as was done in Libya! background made even more. In Qatar, the other day there were two international meetings: the first stage of psychological warfare of the channels Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV coordinated with the American line but also idiots“The Christians in Beirut, the Alevis in the grave! ”40 from any religious stations. meeting on Thursday technicians and engineers discuss the construction of image, video and computers, both inside and outside the studio. Already in Saudi Arabia were placed copies of the Presidential Palace and the central square of Syria in Doha after she was deemed insufficient. Meanwhile, in Riyadh, Saudi ambassador to the U.S., his compatriot Gen. James B. Smith, also a British representative met with Prince Bandar Bin Sultan (him that Bush called “son” of) for a coordination with mercenaries latest in “Freedom Syrian Army” of the rebels.

Islamists and Westerners hand in hand once again.

Here you see Syrian rebel, rebel to plunder the Orthodox church.
Are financed by the U.S., France, Israel and who receive our lenders and partners.
Where is Our government? Archbishop Jerome why does he not speak?

Here you will see the beautiful Orthodox Holy Monastery of St. George of Homer in Syria

It is said that the monastery was built-in the 5th AD century by Emperor Justinian I in on an ancient statue of the god Homer, so it is known as “the monastery of St. George of Homer.”
The monastery stands the main temple, built-in the 19th century within which we admire an impressive wooden temple of great artistic value.

Here you will see the Orthodox Monastery of the Archangels in Syria

The Cherubim Monastery is one of the Orthodox monasteries of Syria and the Patriarchate of Antioch. It is built at an altitude of 2,000 meters above sea level and only 7 km away from the town and there Safntnagia great monastery of Panagia.
The Cherubim Monastery celebrates on Nov. 8, was founded in the 3rd century, but during the 16th century ruined. However, following a decision of the Patriarch of Antioch Ignatius W, rebuilt in 1982 and run by the monks of the neighboring monastery of St. George.
West of the monastery is a large courtyard, where excavations are carried out and have been found underground spaces, possibly catacombs. Next to the monastery was rebuilt recently guest quarters of the monastery and an orphanage.
related photos

Here you see a satellite photo of the Syrian border with imprinted area.With beautiful country 22 million inhabitants.

What is really happening in Syria?

by Eric Margolis

The dark and layered conflict in Syria is getting worse. And with it intensifies and public confusion, here in the West, and the U.S., the UK and some other European media portray civil war underway in Syria as a simple game in which passionate from the evil one is Assad regime Damascus and the other the, mostly unarmed protesters Republican.

The same scalar disappointing media coverage we saw recently in the case of Libya, where he utilized the way media to support foreign intervention. Informing that currently exists for Syria are equally imperfect as it was for Libya, where, incidentally, the situation is dangerously out of control.

The opinions expressed in this article are based on reliable primary sources in Washington, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon:

The support for the Ba’athist regime of Assad family, which has been in power for 41 years, is in constant decline. However, large parts of the armed forces, 17 intelligence and security services, strong minority Alaouiton, most Christians of Syria, some tribal elements and much of the commercial middle and upper classes are still on the side of Assad. Despite strong Western efforts to overthrow, Bashar al-Assad, a bland former ophthalmologist, keeps everything firmly in power.

The U.S., Britain, France, and some conservative Arab allies have funded and armed from the outset uprising in Syria, which began a year ago. In fact, the U.S. fund groups anti polite fontai Assad regime (father and son) from the mid 1990′s. said that weapons and ammunition to the rebels arrive in Syria through Jordan and Lebanon. Wing groups in Lebanon, funded by Western and Arab forces and Israel played a key role in the process of entry into the Syrian territory in the north of the country combatants and equipment.

The Sunni Muslim Brothers raised its head again against the Damascus regime dominated by Alawites. In 1982, the undersigned was outside the Syrian city of Hama when government forces crushed the uprising of the Muslim Brotherhood, killing, an estimated 10,000 people and razing part of the city with heavy artillery.

Now the whole story involved and jihadists(note inprecor: holy war). Recently, small groups of al Qaeda veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan have entered Syria through bombings, car bombs with trying to destabilize the government. The current leader of al Qaeda, Dr Ayman al-Zawahiri, has called for an all out war against the regime of Assad.

If anything is very interesting that the USA, Britain and France are now hugging those same forces of jihad who profess that they despise – and which of course used in Afghanistan in the 80′s and later, in Libya.

In this dangerous mix, one must add the growing number of local militias in Syria, who fight each other and committing heinous crimes against civilians, bringing to mind the bloody civil wars in Iraq and Lebanon.

The main aim of Washington in Syria is felled the Assad regime to hit the closest ally, Iran. there so much anti-Iranian hysteria in the current period in the U.S., if any blow can be achieved against the Islamic Republic is good step. The oldest U.S. fears about the possibility of chaos in a prevalence Syria after the overthrow of Assad, seem now to be forgotten because of the rush to undermine Iran through the destabilization of Syria.The Republicans, led by Senator John McCain, are pushing for war against Syria and President Barack Obama is trying to rein in the hawks of war.

Israel, whose influence in Washington in this election period is unprecedented, raising the fever of war against Syria and Iran . Israel is satisfied that the crises in the two countries have been marginalize the timeliness issue of Palestine and the Golan Heights (note inprecor placed under Israeli occupation in the Six-Day War in 1967 from Syria), which annexed illegally by Israel in 1981 (note inprecor: as happened with East Jerusalem).comes from the Golan in 1/3 of the total water needed Israel. goal of Israel is to see Syria dismembered in conflict cantons, as is currently done in Iraq.

The French right, led by the UMP party of President Nicholas Sarkozy, always wanted to resettle in Lebanon and Syria’s influence was available when colonies of France. The Assad regime in Syria works like a thorn in the side of France for four decades, particularly in Lebanon, which Syria insists that it is still part of history. France hopes to repeat in Syria of stirring up the passions and benefits achieved by supporting the rebels in Libya.

Russia defends Assad regime and is determined not be fooled in the case of Syria from the perspective of a supposedly “humanitarian” intervention as happened in Libya. China is equally cautious. Both But slowly, relax the intensity of their support to Damascus as demonstrated last week by the unanimous call of the UN Security Council for a new peace plan for Syria.

A ceasefire is supererogatory necessary. Syria must stop using heavy weapons in urban areas. But forces outside Syria must stop supporting violent militias that Damascus calls “terrorists.” None of the parties involved has clean hands in Syria.

Eric Margolis, author of War at the Top of the World and American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World

source: lewrockwell.com/margolis

Ultimately I think we must understand what games are played internationally, that Zionism alter the states that terrorists and traitors to their country called democrats and revolutionaries, that Orthodox Christians are targeted and called … terrorists, that the House of Peoples repealed that that …. …. …. how to identify and propagate the truth is something curative in a world steeped in falsehood.

Oct 19 2012

Libya’s Green Resistance Did It… And NATO Powers Are Covering Up

By Mark Robertson and Finian Cunningham

Global Research, September 20, 2012

The NATO powers and the bureaucrats they installed in Libya want you to think that all 5.6 million Libyans are happy that NATO and its proxy terrorists destroyed Libya, whose standard of living had been Africa’s highest under Gaddafi.

They want you to think that NATO brought “freedom and democracy” to Libya, not chaos and death.

They want you to think that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO imperialists or NATO’s Islamist allies in Benghazi.

In reality, the Resistance has been increasingly active since shortly after the murder of Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011, as will be shown below. They strike any NATO target they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against what they see as NATO’s illegal occupation of their country.

Everyone in Libya knows about the Green Resistance, whose members are called “Tahloob” (Arabic for “Gaddafi loyalists”). The denial only happens outside of Libya, by the NATO powers and their dutiful Western mainstream media.

Because of this denial, and because most of the world’s people have forgotten about Libya, the internet is filled with blind guesses, unfounded claims, and ridiculous counterclaims regarding the Benghazi incident last week in which US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and at least three other American personnel were killed. And the NATO lie factory is operating at full blast.

CLAMS, COUNTER-CLAIMS AND DISINFORMATION

The Obama regime says “protesters” irate over an anti-Islam video did it.

The NATO-installed bureaucrats in Libya say that “foreign extremists” did it.

US Congressmen say “Al Qaeda did it”. So does CNN, plus disinformation web sites like Alex Jones’ Prison Planet, which denounces any reference to the Green Resistance as “absurd”. (1)

Media outlets, such as the UK Guardian, say “an organized terror network did it”. (****like Mossad)

Turkey’s government says “Syria’s Assad did it”. (****Syria had no time plus to far to reach)

Israel says “Hezbollah did it”. (*** they would say such a thing just to get America to war with Iran)

The Sunni monarchs of the Gulf Cooperation Council oil sheikdoms say “Iran did it”. (****Let the Gulf explain how? really they do have an imagination!!!! like the Israeli’s)

Even reputable alternative media writers and progressive bloggers have attributed the attack to “the Benghazi Islamist’s”, and that this is “ blow-back from imperialism”.

Wikileaks says the attack happened because the US had backed Britain’s threat to storm the Ecuadorian embassy in London and remove Julian Assange. (2) (****get real who cares about Assange? he is one person! Here we are talking about millions)

Some media outlets claim that “Al Qaeda” carried out the attack in revenge for the supposed death in Pakistan (by US drone strike on 4 June 2012) of Libyan-born Abu Yahya Al Libi (aka Hassan Mohammed Qaid) who was supposedly a key aide to Osama bin Laden, and was supposedly the “number two man” in Al Qaeda. (****Please we all know that “Al Qaeda” its the baby of “CIA & MOSSAD” So they would not do anything without their permission!!!!)

This claim is nonsense, since Al Qaeda has been a group of mercenaries employed by Washington and London since 1980. President Reagan called them “heroes” and “freedom fighters”. The US and Britain sends its Al Qaeda mercenaries to the Balkans, Libya, Syria, Chechnya, Somalia, Sudan, and other places that NATO wants to infiltrate, destroy or destabilize.

NATO pays Ayman Al Zawahiri, the so-called leader of the Al Qaeda mercenaries, to advance NATO imperialism by recording videos and audio-tapes; over 60 of them so far. Zawahiri repeatedly called for the death of Gaddafi, and now he repeatedly calls for the death of Syria’s President Bashar Al Assad. He also calls for Pakistanis to support the Taliban, in order to make the world think the Taliban still exists. He sometimes records in English, and his true identity and whereabouts are a NATO secret. On 11 September 2012, in commemoration of 9/11, he released a video that eulogized Abu Yahya Al Libi, the one supposedly killed by a US drone in June. This “eulogy” had nothing to do with the Benghazi incident, which happened later that night on Tuesday 11 September.

Some claim that Salafists carried out the fatal attack on the US premises. This is more nonsense, since Salafists are NATO allies. Salafists and Wahhabists connote a strict, literalist, and puritanical approach to Islam. They are mainly associated with Saudi Arabia’s feudal style of Islam, and they were allied with NATO against Gaddafi. Now they are allied with NATO against Assad, Iran, Hezbollah, and Shiites generally.

An example of Salafists in Libya is the Ansar Al Sharia – a blanket term for various militias that want to apply strict Sharia law in Libya. Its members are pro-NATO and anti-Green Resistance. They had no reason to attack the US government site in Benghazi which had been instrumental in galvanizing the Islamist insurgency to topple the Gaddafi government, beginning at least from March 2011 and under the supervision of the late Christopher Stevens. Stevens was Washington’s point man in Benghazi and is known to have cultivated strong ties with the Islamists.

In short, it does not make sense that such Benghazi contacts would have wanted or have been motivated to kill their American paymaster.

The most obvious explanation is that cadres – the Green Resistance – loyal to Gaddafi and in opposition to the NATO-imposed regime carried out the attack. NATO and its Libyan quislings don’t want to admit this subversive reality. The fact of a resistance – a potent and growing resistance at that – has to be denied, erased from the record.

TIMING

It was a mere coincidence that the Benghazi attack happened on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11. The Green Resistance was angry that Abdullah Al Senoussi (Gaddafi’s chief of intelligence) had been arrested upon his arrival at Nouakchott airport in Mauritania on 17 March 2012. Then, six days before the Benghazi attack, Mauritania extradited Senoussi to Libya for trial by the NATO-installed bureaucrats.

One day before the Benghazi attack, the NATO puppets put two senior Gaddafi loyalists on trial, accusing them of wasting public money by paying $2.7 billion to families of people killed in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The two Gaddafi loyalists are Abdul Ati Al Obeidi (who had been Gaddafi’s Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, and Head of State) and Mohammed Zwai (former Secretary General of the General People’s Congress – that is, head of the legislature under Gaddafi).

Also, Baghdadi Ali Mahmudi had been Secretary of the General People’s Committee (that is, Prime Minister) under Gaddafi, but escaped from Tripoli on 21 August 2011 as NATO-backed terrorists swept into the city. Mahmudi was arrested in Tunisia for illegal border entry and jailed for six months until his charges were overturned on appeal. On 24 June 2012, Tunisia’s Prime Minister Hamadi Jebali (acting on NATO orders) suddenly had Mahmudi re-arrested and sent back to the NATO puppets in Tripoli, who promptly imprisoned Mahmudi.

Tunisia’s Prime Minister Hamadi Jebali is pro-NATO, and a friend of American hawkish senators McCain and Lieberman. His re-arrest and extradition of Mahmudi angered Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki, who denounced the extradition as illegal, and it also enraged the Libyan Green Resistance. (3)

As for US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, he had promoted Libya’s destruction, having arrived in Benghazi in April 2011 for that purpose, and remained there throughout the NATO seven-month aerial bombardment of Libya. His job was to coordinate the NATO-backed terrorists.

After Libya was destroyed, Stevens had used a Tripoli hotel as his base, since the Green Resistance had burned down the US embassy in the capital, Tripoli. When the Resistance tried to kill him with a car bomb outside the hotel, Stevens moved to the villas in Benghazi, a city in the east of the country whose inhabitants tend to be pro-US and which has long been a hotbed of Islamist Jihadis, many of them furnishing the ranks of NATO’s Afghan Mujaheddin in the 1980′s and later Al Qaeda. (4)

That was over a year ago. (Stevens formally became Obama’s ambassador to Libya in May 2012.)

Stevens was outgoing, and had so underestimated the Green Resistance that he enjoyed jogging in the streets of Benghazi and elsewhere in Libya. (5)

Everyone knew that he and his American staff were present. One figure among the pro-NATO terrorists, Ahmed Al Abbar, says of Stevens: “He was loved by everybody [that is, in Benghazi]”. (6)

Stevens’ popularity with the Benghazi traitors added to the fury of the Green Resistance when they eventually attacked the US site in Benghazi.

Thus, contrary to claims by Western media outlets such as the British Independent, there were no “major security breeches,” and no “mystery” about the attack. All such claims are red herrings designed to distract from the reality of the Green Resistance.

THEY ALL ADMITTED THE TRUTH AT FIRST

The morning after the Benghazi attack, on 12 September, the NATO puppets unwittingly admitted the truth about the “Tahloob” (Green Resistance), and whined that NATO was not doing enough to help crush it. Libyan Deputy Interior Minister Wanis Al Sharif admitted this in a Benghazi news conference, which was later broadcast on Al Jazeera television. (7) (8) (29)

Libya’s Prime Minister Abdurrahim El-Keib also admitted it, as did Libya’s President Mohammed El-Megarif, as well as Ali Aujali, Libya’s Ambassador to Washington, plus Ibrahim Dabbashi, Libya’s ambassador to the UN. All of them said that Gaddafi loyalists had attacked the US site in Benghazi. They would quickly change their change tune under pressure from their NATO masters.

Back on 24 August 2012, Time magazine had noted that Gaddafi “still commands silent admiration in many parts of Libya”. The article quoted President El-Magariaf as saying: “We know that Gaddafi loyalists are behind these bombings [since the overthrow of Gaddafi]. In the last few months, the security services have intensified their campaign against Bani Walid and Tarhuna.” (9)

Bani Walid is a loyalist stronghold whose people held key positions in Gaddafi’s security services. It was also the last city outside of Gaddafi’s birthplace of Sirte to fall to NATO-backed terrorists on 23 January 2012. Magariaf is from Benghazi, and spent 30 years in the US being groomed for the time when NATO would destroy Libya. On 9 August 2012, NATO installed him as Libya’s head of state after an “election”. Magariaf is allied with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is aligned with NATO.

The initial admissions of the truth about the Green Resistance were made on the morning after the attack. Within hours, however, all top Libyan officials, acting under NATO orders, changed their tune, merely calling the attackers “foreign extremists”. Magariaf, the president installed by NATO, went to Benghazi three days after the attack, and declared that “Al Qaeda did it”. (10)

One bureaucrat who would not adopt the NATO spin was Prime Minister Abdurrahim El-Keib, who continued to insist that Gaddafi loyalists were the perpetrators. Therefore, NATO dismissed him as Libya’s prime minister, and replaced him with Mustafa Abushagur, the day after the Benghazi incident. Abushagur had lived most of his life in the USA, and had always been an enemy of Gaddafi. Like so many other US-installed bureaucrats, he had returned to Benghazi in May 2011 during the NATO-instigated insurgency.

Some alternative news outlets acknowledge the truth about the Green Resistance, for example, the Inter Press News Service, which is a non-profit outlet.

IPS spoke with armed Gaddafi loyalists who vowed that they will step up their fight. Government sources alternately claim the perpetrators are former Gaddafi loyalists or Islamists. Further confusion arises from a government clampdown on the dissemination of information in the local media, and by Libyan security forces preventing foreign journalists from covering the scenes of attacks first-hand, or taking pictures. (11)

The Libyan bureaucrats’ clampdown on media information is understandable, since they want to hamper solidarity with the Green Resistance.

MASS DENIAL

Regarding the Benghazi incident, the mass denial begins with basic facts. For example, most people refer to “the US consulate,” when in reality the US site in Benghazi was not an embassy or a consulate, or even a “compound”. It was a collection of villas (that is, a gated community) privately owned by one Mohammad Al Bishari, who was leasing the villas to US State Department personnel. (12)

Collectively the villas were what the US State Department calls an “interim facility”. It had a level of security known as “simple lock and key,” meaning it had no bulletproof glass, reinforced doors, US Marines, or other features common to embassies and consulates. (In Mexico, for example, Washington has an embassy and 22 consulates, but in Libya the US government had only a single embassy in Tripoli – and then, after the NATO bombardment campaign, used the Benghazi villas.)

The corporate media falsely use the term “US consulate” to make it seem that “terrorists attacked US sovereignty”. This justifies the “war on terror,” plus the past destruction of Libya.

Furthermore, the Obama regime calls the privately owned group of villas a “compound” in order to make it seem that the (non-existent) “protesters” brazenly stormed a fortress similar to the massive US embassy complex in Baghdad.

THERE WERE NO PROTESTERS IN BENGHAZI

The White House claims that protesters against that anti-Muslim video “spontaneously” attacked the so-called “consulate.” In reality there were no protesters anywhere in Benghazi at the time of the attack. When Fox News questioned US officials about this, the officials admitted the truth. (13)

Nonetheless, the Obama administration/regime continues to insist that “protesters did it”. This lie not only conceals the Green Resistance; it also makes Muslims all seem irrational and blood-lusting, thereby justifying imperialist aggression (that is, the “war on terror”).

The absence of protesters was confirmed by one of the eight Libyans guarding the private group of villas used by Ambassador Stevens and his staff. The eyewitness, aged 27, is being treated in a hospital for five shrapnel wounds in one leg, and two bullet wounds in the other. He asked that his name be withheld, and that the hospital not be identified, for fear that “militants” (that is, the Green Resistance) would track him down and kill him. (**** I don’t think they will waste a bullet for an idiot like him)

Of the eight Libyan security guards, the eyewitness and four others had been hired by a British firm. The remaining three were members of Libya’s 17th of February Brigade, a group of pro-NATO terrorists formed at the start of the NATO campaign to destroy Gaddafi and Libyan society.

In an interview with McClatchy news service last Thursday (13 September 2012) the eyewitness said there were no protesters at all.

“The Americans would have left if there had been protesters, but there wasn’t a single ant. The area was totally quiet until about 9:35 pm, when as many as 125 men attacked with machine guns, grenades, RPGs, and anti-aircraft weapons. They threw grenades into the villas, wounding me and knocking me down. Then they stormed through the facility’s main gate, moving from villa to villa.”

That does not sound like a “spontaneous protest” against a blasphemous B-movie that suddenly appeared on the internet, as the White House and others claim; rather, it was a sharply executed military strike that must have been planned meticulously well in advance.

The eyewitness managed to escape by telling one of the attackers that he was only a gardener in the gated community. His account is consistent with that of Mohammad Al Bishari, who owns the villas, and was leasing them to the US government. Bishari gave his own account on 12 September, the day after the attack. (12)

Ambassador Stevens was overcome by “severe asphyxia” (smoke inhalation), and was still alive after the attack. Pro-US Libyans in Benghazi carried him to the Benghazi Medical center, where he died later in the night. (14)

RESISTANCE GROWS

NATO destroyed Libya and reduced its people to poverty and violence. In the post-destruction chaos, there are family feuds and inter-militia rivalries. There are long-standing disputes over land, plus long-standing friction between Arabs and Berbers.

However, we shall focus on Resistance attacks against NATO targets, and Resistance assassinations of Libyan figures that betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. The following are only some of the “scores”.

On 18 March 2012, in the Tripoli neighborhood of Abu Salim (a pro-Gaddafi stronghold) local members of the Green Resistance had a shoot-out with a pro-NATO militia group from Zintan led by one Mohammed El-Rebay. (Zintan is a province in Libya’s western mountains.) The Resistance managed to kill one of the Zintan terrorists, who had been using a Tripoli school as their base. (15)

In April 2012, the Resistance detonated a roadside bomb beside a UN convoy that included Ian Martin, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s Special Representative for Libya. (16)

On 29 April 2012, the lifeless body of Shukri Ghanem, Gaddafi’s former oil minister, was found floating in the River Danube. In May 2011, Ghanem had joined NATO, and went off to reside in London and then Vienna. (17) (****Sorry mate here you are wrong we the Green Resistance know exactly who killed Mr. Shukri Ghanem, and No he did not join NATO for further information get in touch with editor)

On 2 May 2012, the Green Resistance claimed responsibility for assassinating General Albarrani Shkal, a former military governor of Tripoli who had demobilized the 38,000 men of his guard and opened the gates of Tripoli to foreign troops during Operation Mermaid Dawn, the sacking of Tripoli that began on 20 August 2011. (Tripoli’s nickname is “The Mermaid”.) (18)

On 15 May 2012, Khaled Abu Salah, a candidate for the Constituent Assembly controlled by NATO, was assassinated near the oasis town of Ubari in southwest Libya. (19)

On 22 May 2012, a rocket-propelled grenade targeted the headquarters of the International Committee of the Red Cross in Benghazi, but caused only structural damage to the premises. The ICRC is headquartered in Geneva, and its foreign offices are often used as cover by Western intelligence agencies, such as MI6 or the CIA.

On 26 May 2012, Mukhtar Fernana, head of the Military Council for the Western Region, survived an assassination attempt.

On 5 June 2012, the Resistance detonated a bomb in front of the US-operated building in Tripoli, damaging its gates.

On 11 June 2012, in Benghazi’s al-Rabha neighborhood, the Resistance fired an RPG at a convoy that carried British Ambassador Dominic Asquith, wounding two of his bodyguards. (20)

Back in July 2011, Abdel-Fattah Younis, the former Qaddafi loyalist turned “rebel” military commander, was assassinated. On 22 June 2012, the judge investigating the death of Younis was himself assassinated in Benghazi.

On 28 July 2012, Suleiman Buzraidah was killed in a drive-by shooting while he was en route to a Benghazi mosque. Buzraidah had been a military intelligence official under Gaddafi, but betrayed him to join the NATO-backed terrorists. (21)

On 29 July 2012, Khalifa Belqasim Haftar narrowly survived an assassination attempt. Formerly one of Gaddafi’s army commanders, in 1988 he betrayed Gaddafi and lived for 23 years under US government protection near CIA headquarters in Virginia. He returned to Libya during the NATO-led insurgency, hoping that after Gaddafi’s death, he would be made commander-in-chief of the Libyan military (controlled by NATO). However, he had to settle for third place in the hierarchy, and was given the rank of Lt. General before the Resistance caught up with him. (****Latest gossip about Haftar’s sons one is dead and the other has escaped Libya after robing the bank in Tripoli of course he is wanted in Tripoli dead or alive the Militia’s are giving a big reward who ever brings him back in which ever condition)

Last month was an especially active four weeks for the Resistance. Security buildings and hotels in Benghazi were rocked by bomb attacks and attempted attacks. Foreign diplomatic staff and embassies were targeted. US embassy staff in Tripoli escaped an attempted carjacking.

On 10 August 2012, eight Resistance members escaped from the Al Fornaj prison in Tripoli after a coordinated attack. Gunmen in pickup trucks outside the prison shot at security guards, while prisoners inside set sections of the prison on fire and managed to overpower a number of guards. This was the third Resistance attack on the prison since the murder of Gaddafi. (22)

On 18 August 2012, the Green Resistance detonated a car bomb outside the Four Seasons Hotel on Omar Al Mukhtar Street in Tripoli. The target was a vehicle being used by Benghazi security officials (installed by NATO) who were staying at the hotel. (22)

Afterwards, the NATO-installed bureaucrats sent heavily armed soldiers to prevent photographs being taken, and to forbid journalists from entering the area, so that word of the Green Resistance would not get out. A Libyan interior ministry official refused to comment further. (22)

The following day, the Resistance set off more car bombs in Tripoli. One bomb was near the administrative offices of the Interior Ministry (controlled by the NATO powers). Two other car bombs exploded minutes later near the former headquarters of a women’s police academy, which NATO now uses for interrogation and detentions. (The latter two bombs killed two passersby.)

The next day in Benghazi (20 August 2012) Resistance members tossed a bomb into the car of Abdel Hamid Refaii, the first secretary of the Egyptian Embassy. This was outside Refaii’s house. However, the assassination bid failed.

The day after that, the then Libyan Prime Minister Abdurrahim El-Keib condemned the Green Resistance in a televised speech, saying: “Desperate and malicious forces among the supporters of the former regime are trying to create tension, send Libya backwards to violence, and sabotage the country’s political process.” (23)

Tripoli’s security chief, Col Mahmoud Sherif, said Gaddafi loyalists were responsible for the spate of violent attacks. He ordered the arrest of 32 suspected Resistance members for interrogation. (24)

Indeed, the police in Tripoli (who now work for the NATO powers) are constantly occupied with defusing car bombs set by the Resistance. (25)

After the Resistance bombing of the former headquarters of a women’s police academy, the NATO puppets sent soldiers to raid a farm where Resistance members were holed up. Several of the Gaddafi loyalists were killed.

One of the members who survived was alleged to have set up sleeper cells in Libya and to have been criss-crossing the border with Tunisia from where he and several comrades were smuggling weapons into Libya for the Resistance. (26)

On 23 August 2012, Abdelmenom Al Hur, official spokesperson for the Supreme Security Committee, installed by NATO, held a press conference in which he admitted that Gaddafi loyalists had penetrated many official security units. He said that a whole barracks full of heavy armaments was under the control of a pro-Gaddafi cell that he called the Awfia Brigade. (The group’s members call themselves the “Martyr Gaddafi Brigade”.) The same Resistance brigade had briefly occupied Tripoli International Airport back in June 2012.

After the attack that killed Ambassador Stevens on 11 September 2012, the Resistance managed to shut down the Benina airport in Benghazi, which the US military was using as a drone base. (27)

With the Resistance firing at US drones, the airport had become unsafe. A Turkish Afriqiyah Airlines flight with 121 people on-board was forced to turn back to Istanbul. (28)

CONCLUSION

The foregoing is only a partial list of Resistance activity over the past year, which has dramatically increased during the last three months, reaching a crescendo in August, and leading to the death of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens last week.

The NATO powers had shifted their focus to destroying Syria, and on continuing their preparations to destroy Iran, while letting their Tripoli bureaucrats handle the Green Resistance in Libya. Now, however, the NATO powers realize that Libya is far from subjugated and that they are being seriously tasked with crushing the Resistance before it gains critical mass.

Marines, drones, and warships have been sent to quash the Gaddafi loyalists – but how to find them? Even the FBI declined to “investigate” the latest attack in Benghazi, realizing that it would be pointless.

Libya presents Washington with another Afghan nightmare – only perhaps worse. If US drones start blasting Libyans, and the US military rounds up tens of thousands of suspected loyalists, then the Resistance can only become stronger. Of Libya’s 5.6 million people, only one in 10 (that is, the population of the eastern city of Benghazi) welcomed the NATO bondage and destruction of their country.

Meanwhile, the NATO powers do not want the Western public to realize any of this awkward truth. They want you to think that all Libyans are happy under NATO’s “liberation” with their Islamist terrorist proxies. Some 50,000 Libyans lost their lives due to NATO’s bombing and ground campaign during 2011. And for what? Only for a Resistance to rise up to illustrate to the world that Libyans had their country stolen from them by NATO powers in a criminal war of aggression.

The more the Libyan Green Resistance gains strength and challenges the NATO-imposed regime, the more clear it becomes that the Western governments and their media lied in their pretexts of “responsibility to protect (R2P)” human rights and democracy. Recall that these were the pretexts invoked by the NATO powers to justify setting up No-Fly Zones in Libya in March 2011. (The same pretexts are again being reiterated with regard to Syria.)

But, as the growing Resistance illustrates, the Western powers did not “liberate” Libya; they invaded a sovereign country and killed massively to execute their real, criminal agenda of regime change and theft of oil resources. Now the people of Libya are resisting this criminal conquest. And that damning truth has to be expunged at all costs.

Before the Benghazi incident, the corporate media had occasionally mentioned Gaddafi loyalists. After the incident, all such mention has suddenly ceased. The media say that “extremists” attacked the US site in Benghazi. Or “Al Qaeda” or “Islamists” or “terrorists,” or “protesters” – anyone but the Resistance.

Not true. The Green Resistance lives, and furthermore it is only getting started.

Mark Robertson is a political analyst based in Mexico City quatloos.x@gmail.com

Finian Cunningham is a freelance journalist based in East Africa cunninghamfinian@gmail.com

Notes

1)http://www.prisonplanet.com/consulate-attack-nato-stooge-ludicrously-points-finger-at-gaddafi-loyalists.html

(2)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9540728/WikiLeaks-blames-US-stance-on-Julian-Assange-for-Libyan-embassy-attack.html

(3)http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/06/2012624135853340329.html

(4)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/13/world/middleeast/for-veteran-envoy-return-to-libya-was-full-of-hope.html?_r=1&ref=middleeast

(5)http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/13/us-usa-libya-stevens-idUSBRE88B13B20120913

(6)http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Chris-Stevens-US-envoy-to-the-Arab-world-3860408.php#ixzz26t2Xx6Zi

(7)http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/12/us-libya-usa-attack-loyalists-idUSBRE88B0K920120912

(8)http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/09/20129112108737726.html

(9)http://world.time.com/2012/08/24/the-bomb-attacks-in-libya-are-gaddafi-loyalists-behind-them/

(10)http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/15/despite-arrests-in-consulate-attack-confusion-persists-in-libya.html

(11)http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/08/gaddafi-loyalists-up-in-arms/

(12)http://www.examiner.com/article/eyewitnesses-no-protest-at-u-s-consulate-libya-before-attack-began

(13)http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/17/obama-administration-libyan-president-clash-over-explanation-on-consulate/

(14)http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57511234/libyan-doctor-u.s-ambassador-christopher-stevens-died-of-severe-asphyxia/

(15)http://rt.com/news/libya-clashes-militia-gaddafi-loyalists-857/

(16)http://www.tunisia-live.net/2012/08/22/car-bomb-targeting-egyptian-diplomat-in-benghazi-raises-security-questions/

(17)http://libyanfreepress.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/execution-of-big-traitor-general-shkal-claimed-by-green-resistance/

(18)http://www.voltairenet.org/Libyan-settling-of-scores

(19)http://www.tunisia-live.net/2012/05/15/candidate-for-libyan-constituent-assembly-assassinated-after-filing-to-run/

(20)http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/11/us-libya-attack-britain-idUSBRE85A0TV20120611

(21)http://menasassociates.blogspot.com/2012/08/libya-security-system-failures.html

(22)http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/08/gaddafi-loyalists-up-in-arms/

(23)http://www.tunisia-live.net/2012/08/22/car-bomb-targeting-egyptian-diplomat-in-benghazi-raises-security-questions/

(24)http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/20/gaddafi-loyalists-held-blasts-libya

(25)http://jn1.tv/breaking-news/militants-bomb-egyptian-diplomat-s-car-in-benghazi.html

(26)http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/08/gaddafi-loyalists-up-in-arms/

27)http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-09-14/news/sns-rt-us-protests-libya-airportbre88d0pj-20120914_1_benghazi-drones-libyan-rebels

(28)http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/141946/libya-shuts-benghazi-air-space-turkish-plane-returns-home-.html

(29)http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/libya-official-says-gaddafi-loyalists-killed-us-diplomats-104805571.html

Jul 30 2012

How Amnesty International and the NATO Cover Up of War Crimes in Libya March 2012

By Christof Lehmann — nsnbc. Yesterday, on 19 March 2012, Amnesty International was calling on NATO to “investigate the killing of dozens of civilians during it`s air campaign last year and to provide reparations to the people affected”. Amnesty further stated that “adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to the victims and their families”. NATO rebutted Amnesty International`s call for an investigation and compensation for the “dozens” of civilians, and in doing so, NATO has entered an elegant propaganda dance macabre. A propaganda dance macabre, designed to dominate and more importantly direct the public and political discourse away from the true dimensions and proportions of the war crimes that were committed under NATO command as well as command responsibility.

The “human rights organization” that is branding itself as “watchdog” is obviously attempting to make even well intended humanitarian minded members of the worlds public belief, that NATO`s Operation Unified Protector, authorized by UNSC Resolution 1973 has resulted in 55 documented cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women that were killed in air strikes in the capital Tripoli and the towns of Zliten, Majer, Sirte, and Brega. The amnesty narrative must make the heart of every NATO propaganda expert jump faster. Possibly, Amnesty is positioning itself for a Nobel Peace Price, where it would be in perfect company with Barak Hussein Obama, Henry Kissinger and other humanitarian avatars. After all, Amnesty International USA has Suzanne Nossel at the helm. A Hilary Clinton aide for International Organizations Affairs.

Reality Amnesty-Style is depended on the all important methodology. With the correct methodology it is possible to reduce a genocide to 55 documented cases …

Visit also: http://www.algaddafi.org/

Jun 20 2012

Free invitation to Obama, Cameron, Sarkozi to Live the Arabic Spring in Libya.

Free invitation to Obama, Hilary Clinton, Senator McCain, Suzanne Rice, Cameron, Sarkozy, Bernard-Henri Levi, Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani to Live the Arabic Spring in Libya.

To Feel and touch the greatest result of the so-called Revolution was made by rats Oh Sorry, I mean rebels (no freedom fighters) because I remember you saying innocent people (rebels).

Welcome to the hell (Libya), choose any area in Libya and come to enjoy with us the explosions sounds:

1 explosion per minute, don’t worry it’s one of the rebels trying to storm a camp or innocent house to steal a car, or to rape his daughter, or it’s one of the members of Zintan fighting against a member of Souq Jumma or Misurata rebels fighting against of Benghazi in the city, or it might be a member of Benghazi wants money from the bank , or they want to capture someone because he is supporter of Gaddafi .

I promise you if you go to the Beach I want you to see the nice view of the sea in Tripoli, Oh! please don’t be Surprised if you see one of the Al Qaeda members they are so lovely, they only KILL single girls who go with their family to the sea because they consider this a disbelief, don’t be shock if you see armed gangs kidnapping a girl or boy they only want money to hand this innocent son or daughter to his family .

If you don’t like the view from Tripoli let’s go to Benghazi, don’t be surprised if you see some rebels raping a French or a UK journalist it’s normal and everyday such things happens, I think it’s happening in your country too right?

Anyway don’t fear if you see someone killing others calm down ok ? Nothing will hurt you, just turn a blind eye .

If you don’t like it let’s go to any restaurant, yes if you have weapon we will take anything free, have you any? Oh don’t worry if you haven’t anyway someone of Al Zintan or Benghazi or Misurata will storm in the restaurant to take the food for his partners and the owner will shake and ask us to leave, don’t worry we just have to go at 10 am the rats oh sorry the rebels usually come at 10:30 am.

If you want to go to a hotel, my advice to you is to be in the middle of the city because we can only hear explosions from far distance and if you want to see it we can go to the center of the city but please remember we have to be back to the hotel at 6 pm other wise you will be kidnapped and you if are a diplomatic man there will be another Military intervention .

Do you have Visa card? Don’t bring it because there is No ATM machine working they are all destroyed, sorry to tell you this but the rats ( rebels ) are thieves .

If you couldn’t sleep at night because of the sounds of the clashes don’t be upset you will get used to it in three days, because we completed the course of NATO, yes believe me all Eight months you were bombing us we got used to sleep while your Military aircraft bombed Libya .

source: https://www.facebook.com/Millions.Supporting.Gaddafi

Mar 12 2012

John McCain: Founding Father of the Terrorist Emirate of Benghazi

Benghazi declares autonomy, raises Al-Qaeda flag. McCain seeks to spread terrorist empire to Syria.

by Tony Cartalucci

March 7, 2012 - “I have met with these brave fighters, and they are not Al-Qaeda. To the contrary: They are Libyan patriots who want to liberate their nation. We should help them do it.” - Senator John McCain in Benghazi, Libya April 22, 2011.

Image: And yet, the very courthouse McCain uttered his lies in front of is now flying the flag of Al Qaeda, while crowds have been photographed in the streets of Benghazi carrying it aloft since the fall of Qaddafi. Clearly, the senator from Arizona was “mistaken.” (click images to enlarge)

….

Even as McCain deceived the world with his comments in pursuit of overthrowing and destroying the sovereign nation-state of Libya, it was already a matter of record, according to America’s own West Point Combating Terrorism Center, that Benghazi, and much of eastern Libya known as Cyrenaica, served as an epicenter for global Al Qaeda recruitment. Militants hailing from the eastern region’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) would end up in both Afghanistan and Iraq fighting Western troops and participating in sectarian violence.

This included LIFG leader Abdul Hakim Belhaj aka Abdul Hakim Hasadi, who first fought alongside the CIA against the Soviets in Afghanistan, then against US and British troops before eventually being captured by the US and handed over to Qaddafi who imprisoned him for 7 years. Upon his release, he would promptly be sponsored by NATO and the likes of John McCain, given arms, money, and training just as he was by the CIA during the Soviet Afghan-invasion, with the addition of NATO close air support in his bid to overthrow the Libyan government.

Video: McCain can’t plead ignorance – international news has covered Al Qaeda’s involvement in Libya, and now in Syria for well over a year.

….

Belhaj and other militant factions constituting the “Libyan rebels” would go on a genocidal rampage throughout the country, encircling cities like Bani Walid and Sirte, cutting off food, water, electricity, and emergency aid while NATO mercilessly bombed populated city centers for days, weeks, and in the case of Sirte, months.

Belhaj is now the military commander of Tripoli and has been reported to be working with Syrian militants to repeat NATO’s campaign of atrocities, destabilization, and Balkanization in Syria, where he is said to be importing weapons and funds as well as LIFG fighters.

There is no doubt that the men McCain was defending were LIFG fighters, terrorists linked directly with Al Qaeda according to West Point reports (.pdf), and listed to this day by the US State Department and the UK Home Office (.pdf) as a “foreign terrorist organization.” McCain was not only rhetorically supporting listed terrorists, but providing material support including weapons, funds, training, and airsupport in direct violation of USC § 2339A & 2339B, “providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations.”

Video: McCain can easily be considered one of the founding fathers of the autonomous Al Qaeda terror-emirate of Benghazi, a distinction that makes a mockery of the 6,000+ US troops that gave their lives for the fraudulent “War on Terror” McCain is so fond of promoting.

….

In a recent turn of events, it has been reported that the city of Benghazi has declared autonomy from Tripoli, raising the Al Qaeda flag and becoming in effect, a terror-emirate, one whose capital McCain had stood in, praising men who had American blood on their hands and were in the process of (and still are) carrying out racist genocide. Thanks to McCain’s support, the forces of Al Qaeda have achieved in one year what Qaddafi had prevented them from doing for decades. They now have a vast region, rich in oil resources gladly siphoned by Western corporations, to use as a base of terror – one of the very supposed scenarios McCain helped send 6,000+ US troops to their graves in Iraq and Afghanistan to prevent.

But McCain’s treason, national, and international crimes don’t begin or end there. His International Republican Institute (IRI) was mentioned by name in the New York Times as being behind the supposedly “indigenous” “spontaneous” “Arab Spring” unrest in the first place. In an April 2011 article published by the New York Times titled, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” it was stated:

“A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington.”

After helping overthrow the Egyptian government, McCain would lead representatives from Wall Street’s Fortune 500 corporations on a tour of Cairo like conquerors surveying their new dominion. He would also taunt the heads of state of both Russia and China, revealing the final destination of the chaos and destabilization he has been helping along by claiming, “I would be a little less cocky in the Kremlin with my KGB cronies today if I were Vladimir Putin. I would be a little less secure in the seaside resort [of] President Hu and a few men who govern and decide the fate of 1.3 billion people.”

The work of McCain’s IRI more recently manifested itself when it was caught meddling in Russia’s elections late last year and again just this month. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a US government funded umbrella organization under which the IRI falls and the IRI itself, were behind several US-backed NGOs, particularly GOLOS, seeking to “expose voting irregularities.” The purpose of this was of course to cast doubts on the validity of the elections and justify street mobs brought out by the Russian opposition groups the IRI had been cultivating in an attempt to trigger an “Arab Spring” in Russia.

Image: Screenshot taken of McCain’s messages regarding unrest he and his IRI have prepared and are now trying to trigger in the streets of Russia. (click to enlarge.)

….

And just this week, echoing his frothing warmongering over Libya, McCain called for US airstrikes on Syria. Promoting the use of America’s military while being unable to cite any credible or imminent threat to US territorial security would seem like a punishable offense or at least a sign of mental instability and grounds for dismissing the aged Senator. Instead, McCain represents the public face and voice of the corporate-financier agenda of Wall Street and London which has plotted a premeditated blitzkrieg from Tunisia to Thailand, and eventually to the doorsteps of both Moscow and Beijing.

On the eve of possible Western intervention in Syria, and with warmongers like John McCain, fellow IRI chairman Lindsey Graham, and Senator Joseph Lieberman calling for a repeat of Libya, it is essential that Americans look at the Al Qaeda flags waving over Benghazi and recognize McCain’s role helping hoist them aloft.

Thousands of American troops have shed their lives in a war they believed was meant to fight these very men now being handed nation after nation by US senators like McCain, who in fact were the principle proponents of the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq. We are not witnessing a wave for liberation and democracy sweeping the globe, but rather a sinister deception paved in blood, terror, and betrayal of all kinds crafting a world not for ‘we the people’ to thrive in, but for Wall Street and London to feed on.

source: Land Destroyer

Feb 20 2012

Two US Senators Call For Arming Syrian Opposition Filled With al Qaeda Terrorists

The Intel Hub

February 20, 2012

US Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, speaking at a news conference in Kabul Afghanistan, outlined their support and demands that the US openly arm Syrian opposition forces fighting to topple the Assad regime.

The demands come despite recent acknowledgements by top US counter terrorism officials that al Qaeda operatives have infiltrated the Syrian opposition and have carried out terror attacks against the Assad led Syrian government.

A recent New York Times article outlined the Syrian proposals while conveniently ignoring the Syrian opposition forces clear connection with al Qaeda. (An organization used to systematically destroy civil liberties throughout the United States)

The senators, John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, both Republicans, laid out a series of diplomatic, humanitarian and military aid proposals that would put the United States squarely behind the effort to topple President Bashar al-Assad of Syria.

The senators, both of whom are on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that rebel fighters deserved to be armed and that helping them take on the Syrian government would aid Washington’s effort to weaken Iran.

Syria relies on Iran for financial and military support, and the governments in Damascus and Tehran have sectarian ties as well: Iran has strongly backed the Syrian Shiite minority and the offshoot Alawite sect that makes up Syria’s ruling class.

“I believe there are ways to get weapons to the opposition without direct United States involvement,” Mr. McCain said. “The Iranians and the Russians are providing Bashar Assad with weapons. People that are being massacred deserve to have the ability to defend themselves.”

“So I am not only not opposed,” he said, “but I am in favor of weapons being obtained by the opposition.”

Sadly the American people are once again being duped into supporting our supposed enemies.

This is essentially a military industrial complex psyop filled game where we first support “terrorists” then attack them, and finally go on to support them once again.

This deadly game continued in Libya and now seems set to commence in Syria as the war hawks set their eyes on an eventual attack on Iran.

Note: The US are most likely already funding the Syrian opposition through Soros fueled NGOs and “human rights” organizations which have historically been used as tools of the globalist cabal commonly referred to as the new world order. This open admission may simply be an attempt to publicly acknowledge something that has long ago begun.