TEHRAN – Retired US Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, who once served as Secretary of State Colin Powell’s Chief of Staff, believes that the chemical weapons used in Syria may have been an Israeli “false flag” operation aimed at implicating Bashar Assad’s regime.
Wilkerson made his astounding assertion in an interview on Current TV, the network once owned by former Vice President Al Gore and recently purchased by Al-Jazeera, Haaretz reported.
Wilkerson said that the evidence that it was Assad’s regime that had used the chemical weapons was “flaky” and that it could very well have been the rebels or Israel who were the perpetrators. Asked why Israel would do such a thing, Wilkerson said, “I think we’ve got a basically geostrategically, geopolitical inept regime in Tel Aviv right now.”
“I think we saw really startling evidence of that,” Wilkerson continued, “in the fact thatPresident Obama had to tell Bibi Netanyahu ‘Pick up the phone, you idiot, call Ankara and get yourself out of this strategic isolation you’re in right now.’”
A “false flag” operation is a covert attack on foreign or domestic soilcarried out by governments or organizations under a false identity, aimed at placing blame on the enemy. It originates with a ruse once used in naval warfare in which ships would hoist the enemy’s flags in order to infiltrate his ranks.
Wilkerson,63, a former Army helicopter pilot who flew combat missions in Vietnam, served as Colin Powell’s chief of staff in 2002-2005. He was responsible for reviewing the intelligence information used by Powell in his by now infamous February 2003 United Nations Security Council appearance on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.
After his retirement, Wilkerson described this presentation as “a hoax” and became an outspoken critic of the Bush Administration’s handling of the Iraq war. He now serves as a professor at Virginia’s William and Mary College and is a guest commentator on several US television networks.
Speaking on the Current’s Young Turks program, Wilkerson said that because of the instability in the Middle East, Israel’s current geo-strategic situation is “as dangerous as it’s been since 1948.”He added that President Obama “has got to be very circumspect about what he does in exacerbating that situation”.
“Netanyahu is clueless as to this,” Wilkerson said. “I hope President Obama gave him a lecture in geostrategic realities.”
In an interview with Russia’s Channel One, Berkan Yashar, who is also a Turkish politician, said the US has not killed the al-Qaeda leader.
“In September of 1992, I was in Chechnya, that’s when I first met the man whose name was Bin Laden. This meeting took place in a two-story house in the city of Grozny; on the top floor was a family of Gamsakhurdia, the Georgian president, who then was kicked out of his country. We met on the bottom floor; Osama lived in the same building,” Yashar said.
“Even if the entire world believed, I could not possibly believe it,” Yashar said. “I personally know the Chechens who protected him, they are Sami, Mahmood, and Ayub, and they were with him until the very end.”
“Only three Chechens buried him, according to his will” in the mountains on the Pakistan-Afghan border, he said.
Yashar added that the CIA abducted one of the bodyguards, Sami, before the announced killing of Bin Laden last year.
He says the bodyguard disclosed to the US the exact place of burial in the mountains.
“There was no assault. I know the American operations from the inside: they find the grave, dig out bin Laden and tell everyone about this. They need to show how technologically the security services worked, how each step was controlled, and then present it as a great victory to show that taxpayers are not paying taxes for nothing,” he said.
Washington announced on May 2, 2011 that Bin Laden was killed by US forces in his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
The lack of transparency over bin Laden’s death has cast further doubt over the announcement.
According to the former CIA agent, he personally knew Bin Laden’s three Chechen bodyguards, who had protected him until his death and witnessed his death on June 26, 2006.
New evidence reveals the Obama administration’s version of the events that took place in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 was based on a tissue of lies. The Weekly Standard’s Steven Hayes has obtained a timeline and a series of emails revealing the self-serving efforts made by administration officials, who heavily edited CIA talking points about the attack that cost four Americans, including ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, their lives.Also revealed is who made the changes and why they made them.
The revelations are part of a reportpublished by the five Republican Committee chairmen that has been largely dismissed by a calculatingly indifferent media, despite the reality that it includes direct quotes from administration officials, along with footnotes indicating the times the messages were sent. Although the names of some officials have been omitted in some places, the Weekly Standard has confirmed the identity of two administration officials who authored two critical emails: one illuminating the reason for the editing itself and the other announcing a September 15 meeting of top administration officials, where the ultimate draft of the talking points would be finalized.
What they sought to obscure is the reality that while the initial attack was still taking place, the State Department Operations Center sent out two alerts, at 4:05 p.m and 6:08 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). The former indicated an attack was taking place. The latter alert revealed that an al Qaeda-linked terrorist group, Ansar al Sharia, was claiming credit for it. According to the House report, these alerts were widely circulated among administration officials, including those at the highest levels of government. Another cable sent by the CIA station chief in Libya the following day reveals that eyewitnesses confirmed that a terrorist attack involving the participation of Islamic jihadists had occurred.
It was exactly that reality the administration sought to obscure.
The Standard reveals the three versionsof the edited talking points.Version 1 was distributed internally for comment at 11:15 a.m. on Friday, September 14. Key points include:
–The initial theory that the Benghazi attacks “were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. embassy in Cairo”;
–”Islamic extremists with ties to al Qa’ida participated”;
–Members of Ansar al Sharia “were involved”;
–”Wide availability of weapons and experienced fighters in Libya contributed to the lethality of the attacks”;
–”Five other attacks against foreign interests” had taken place since April, leading to the possibility that the consulate had been “previously surveilled”;
–The U.S. is “working w/Libyan authorities and intelligence partners” to bring those responsible to justice.
After this draft’s initial distribution, the CIA amended it, adding two more points. “On 10 September we warned of social media reports calling for a demonstration in front of the [Cairo] Embassy and that jihadists were threatening to break into the Embassy,” and “The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al Qaeda in Benghazi and Libya.” They also changed two talking points: the reference to “al Qa’ida” was removed, and Benghazi “attacks” became “demonstrations.”
An hour into the vetting process, the official confirmed by the Standard to be Victoria Nuland raised “serious concerns”–about the political impact, fearing that Congress would hammer the State Department for “not paying attention to Agency warnings.”Minor revisions followed, but they weren’t good enoughfor Nuland, who said the changes did not“resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership,” further warning that State Department officials would directly contact National Security Council (NSC) officials as a result. In a matter of moments, the House report noted, that “White House officials responded by stating that the State Department’s concerns would have to be taken into account.” It was then that Ben Rhodes notified the various groups working on the pointsthat a meeting would take place on September 15 to resolve their issues.
Version two of the report was put together at 9:45 a.m. on Saturday. According to officials with knowledge of what occurred at this meeting of the Deputies Committee, CIA deputy director Mike Morrel heavily edited this version, removing 148 of its 248 words.The entirety of the previous report was reduced to the “spontaneous attack” theory, followed by the idea that “this assessment may change as additional information is made available,” and that the “investigation is ongoing to help bring justice to those responsible for the deaths of U.S. citizens.”
Less than two hours later, those three points became the bullet points in Version three, which became the final version of the administration’s talking points.
On Sunday, September 16, UN Ambassador Susan Ricewas sent out by the administration to pitch the Muslim video canard. The following day, Nuland rose to Rice’s defense. “What I will say, though, is that Ambassador Rice, in her comments on every network over the weekend, was very clear, very precise, about what our initial assessment of what happened is. And this was not just her assessment, it was also an assessment you’ve heard in comments coming from the intelligence community, in comments coming from the White House.”
Yet even the redacted version of the talking points never mentioned anything about a video.Despite that reality, the administration, led by Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,continued to pitch that mendacious version of the events, inaugurating the Obama administration’s ongoing efforts to mislead the American public in the weeks leading up to the presidential election— weeks during which we were assured that al Qa’ida and terror were “on the run.”
At a press briefing last Friday, State Department spokesperson Patrick Ventrell declined to comment regarding Nuland’s involvement, and why critical details were edited out of the final draft. “We regularly discuss our public messaging with our interagency counterparts, that’s part of what happens in the interagency,” said Ventrell. “ We’re not going to get into the details…of our internal deliberative process on these. We continue to be transparent with the congress, and have been, and shared thousands of documents. Talking points is something that they’ve looked into.”
Yet the “most transparent administration in history” provided the emails to members of the House and Senate intelligence committees on the stipulation that they would only be available for a limited time, and not turned over to the committees. That agreement was part of a political deal whereby Senate Republicans would not hold up the nomination of current CIA Director John Brennan.
As damning as these revelations are, they are far from the only problems the Obama administration faces in a scandal that can no longer be contained. Last Thursday, it was revealed that the State Department’s Office of Inspector General will be conducting an investigation of the Accountability Review Board’s (ARB) report, an outrageous whitewash whose central conclusion was the idea that “the tragic loss of life, injuries, and damage to U.S. facilities and property rests solely and completely with the terrorists who perpetrated the attacks.” According to well-placed sources, the IG wants to determine if the ARB declined to interview critical witnesses,who wanted to provide their accounts of Benghazi to the panel whose conclusions insulated top officials–including Hillary Clinton–for the “inadequate security” at the consulate.
Two of those whistleblowers, now revealed to be Gregory Hicks, Foreign Service Officer and former Deputy Chief of Mission/Chargé d’Affairs in Libya, and Mark Thompson, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism, are being represented by Washington attorneys Victoria Toensing and her husband Joseph DiGenova, respectively. Appearing on “Geraldo” Saturday night, Toensing told Rivera that “the things that her client will be saying will be contradictory to what the administration’s scenario was.” DiGenova promised that “what will come out of the hearing is that the Accountability Review Board conducted by General Pickering and Admiral Mullen will be proven to have been a cover-up–one of the worst jobs ever done in the history of governmental reporting…”
DiGenova further noted that neither Pickering or Mullen ever interviewed Hillary Clinton during their investigation, and that when Pickering was told he would have to deal with it, he became physically ill.
The third witness expected to testify is Eric Nordstrom, diplomatic security officer and former regional security officer in Libya. Nordstrom, who was based in Tripoli until two months before the attack, is the security officer who twice requested additional security in Benghazi before the attack. Nordstrom cited a chronology that included 200 security incidents in Libya between June 2011 and July 2012, including 48 that occurred in Benghazi.
An equally explosive revelation emerged a week ago,when an anonymous U.S. special operatortold Fox News the administration’s contention that no forces were available to get to Benghazi in time was also a lie.“I know for a fact that C 110, the EUCOM CIF, was doing a training exercise, not in the region of northern Africa, but in Europe. And they had the ability to react and respond,” he contended. The C 110 is a 40-man special ops force reportedly capable of conducting rapid response and deployment. They were located only three-and-a-half hours away in Croatia on Sept. 11.
The operator revealed there were other members of special ops and other officials aware and involved, but that they would be “decapitated if they came forward with information that could affect high-level commanders.”The Fox source added that members of the special ops community feel betrayed, and believe that betrayal goes to the highest levels of the administration.
The administration apparently couldn’t care less. Last Tuesday at his press conference, President Obama claimed he was “unaware” of any effort to prevent whistleblowers from testifying. On the same day, Secretary of State John Kerry contended that there is “an enormous amount of misinformation out there.” ”We have to demythologize this issue and certainly depoliticize it,” Kerry told reporters at the State Department. “The American people deserve answers. I’m determined that this will be an accountable and open State Department as it has been in the past, and we will continue to do that, and we will provide answers.”
Kerry had previously expressed frustration with Republicans for refusing to accept the conclusions of the ARB. “Let’s get this done with, folks,” Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee in testimony last month. “Let’s figure out what it is that’s missing, if it’s legitimate or isn’t. I don’t think anybody lied to anybody. And let’s find out exactly, together, what happened, because we got a lot more important things to move on to and get done.”
Last Wednesday, White House press secretary Jay Carney echoed Kerry’s indifference. “Let’s be clear,” he said. “Benghazi happened a long time ago. We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appearbefore Congress to provide information related to Benghazi.”
On Saturday, Rep. Darrel Issa (R-CA), the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, praised the State Department officials who have agreed to testify at the hearings. “They have critical information about what occurred before, during, and after the Benghazi terrorist attacks that differs on key points [from the administration,]” Issa said in a statement. “Our committee has been contacted by numerous other individuals who have direct knowledge of the Benghazi terrorist attack, but are not yet prepared to testify,” he added. “In many cases their principal reticence of appearing in public is their concern of retaliation at the hands of their respective employers,” Issa said.
State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell took issue with that characterization. “The State Department would never tolerate or sanction retaliation against whistleblowers on any issue, including this one,” Ventrell contended. “That’s an obligation we take very seriously, full stop.”
The country will find out exactly how seriously beginning Wednesday,when the House Oversight Committee resumes its hearings. It remains to be seen how mainstream media outlets, many of which have been more than willingto dismiss the investigation into the deaths of four Americans as a Republican conspiracy theory, will handle what is likely to be some of the most explosive testimony on the attack to date history. Benghazi may have happened “a long time ago,”but it is not going away anytime soon.
“war through deception” Israel orchestrating world war
DEBKA openly admits plans to move Israeli troops into Syria and Iraq, to “con” Turkey, Jordan and the Arab and Gulf States into a war intended to, not just destroy Iran and Pakistan but China and Russia as well, pitting them against NATO in the fatal Armageddon they and their followers believe will ensure Satan’s dominion over man.
Do people really think like that?
Yes, they actually do, the Zionists, the Neocons, and the Dominionists, a vast worldwide network of financial criminals, corrupt politicians and power-mad tyrants. In America, those now seeking to stage a military coup in the United States,submit to full Israeli control and lead the world into a new “dark age.”
Conspiracy theory? Of course, very much so, but not just a theory but plans long whispered now made clear, plans impossible to misconstrue.
Plans in motion
The plans are clear, an invasion of Syria, splitting the Kurdish region of Iraqoff, into an Israeli controlled military bastion for an invasion of Iran. What isn’t being said, however, is that, in order to push the United States back to warafter a decade of military and economic disasters, assassinations, false flag terror and a campaign of counterfeit WMD intelligence is planned.
The proposed moves, as outlined below and confirmed through DEBKA, would require the United States to return to “Bush era unilateralism,”moves unlikely if President Obama, Secretaries Kerry and Hagel and JCOS Chief, General Martin Dempsey were still alive, despite wild conspiratorial claims quoted below.
Softening up the Goyim
The American president is a likely assassination target. A new 9/11 style terror attack is a necessity, the groundwork already laid at Sandyhook and the Boston Marathon.
The preparations are already underway, with political and military division in the US being contrived, “sequestration,”threats of gun seizure and a planned economic crash, another “pump and dump.”
The terrorism is underway as seen in Boston, hoax articles outlining an imaginary 20,000 man US force to move into Syriaas a “buffer” have been placed in American newspapers.
World conquest and planetary annihilation
In theMiddle East,Israel is coordinating with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States along with Turkey, the Mossad supported Communist PKK terrorists in Turkey, key leaders in the Kurdish Regional Government of Iraq, Al Qaeda led rebels and Druze militias inside Syria.
Syria and Iraq will be dismembered.Jordan has already fallen to Israel and their Al Qaeda allies, now Israel’s base of operations against not just Syria but Iraq as well.
From there, the move will be Iran, then Afghanistan and the Caspian Basin.
If China and Russia fail to recognize the threat in time and “go nuclear” to block this move against Asia, the planned attack on Pakistan, scheduled for a 2015-2017 time frame will bring about a world war.
Beginning with deception and cover
More stories have been planted, more hoaxes, describing an agreement allowing Israel to build an air base in Turkeyto attack Iran. Turkey has failed to issue denials though such an act would label them a rogue state. They are playing a very dangerous game and can well expect the betrayal any “friend” of Israel suffers.
Turkey is fully “onboard,” cutting a deal with the Kurdish PKK, a first step toward joining Israel in a conquest of Northern Iraq. Israel has also promised Turkey an “occupation zone” comprising nearly a third of Syria.
Azerbaijan has long been steeped in Israeli/Turkish plots. They have been promised Iran’s Caspian oil reserves.
They actually put it in writing
Key to this is getting the United States to follow the plans DEBKA clearly outlines for them.
Issue 585, dated April 26, 2013 has laid out their startling plans beginning with a broad move into Syria. Israel has no plans to use its own troops, of course.Since their defeat in Lebanon in 2006, the IDF has been shown as capable of mass punishment and reprisals against unarmed civilians inside Israel and the occupied zones.
DEBKA’s “fairytale” is carefully coordinated with terror cells and death squads in the US, all working under the broad cover of America’s Israeli controlled press:
“On Friday, April 26, a few hours after this issue reaches DEBKA-Net-Weekly subscribers, Jordan’s King Abdullah II will be sitting down at the White House with President Barack Obama. When they finish talking, they will shake hands on the exact date in the coming days for the consignment of 20,000 American troops to the Hashemite Kingdom.
Obama has ordered the biggest overt surge of US troops in six years in any Middle East country.
This air base will be home to the incoming American troops. US engineering corps units have been working 24/7 to expand the base, adapt it to its new functions and construct accommodation for the GIs.
Most of the contingents will be airlifted to their new base from US and Europe through Israeli air space, according to DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s exclusive military sources.
Israeli Air Force jets will escort the transports over the eastern Mediterranean until they touch down in Jordan and keep an air umbrella in place over the American force for the duration of its stay.
The heavy equipment– tanks, missiles, self-propelled artillery, armored vehicles and Patriot missile intercept batteries – will be transported by sea to two destinations: Jordan’s Red Sea port of Aqaba and the Israeli port of Haifa.
These arrangements were tied up by Defense Secretary Hagel in his talks this week with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz.
In those conversations, our sources disclose,Israeli leaders offered every assistance, including air and intelligence resources, needed for preserving the Hashemite throne in Jordan, including support for the incoming US force. Netanyahu gave his pledge to King Abdullah on the four occasions that they met in Amman.”
The plans, quoted directly from the highest Israeli and Jordanian sources, could never be realized without an America crippled by powerful terrorist organizations like AIPAC, long above any law.
Current American doctrine prohibits any military action without, not only a UN Security Council resolution but a new National Intelligence Estimate. Previous “NIE’s” had found no evidence of nuclear programs in Iran. Similarly, current Israeli claims of WMD use by Syria were rejected by Washington this week.
Israel’s plans are clear.What is also clear is that many Americans will dieto get Israel the war they want, the war that Zionism needs to survive.
What is also clear is that, in order to get that war, more Americans will die and that many have died already.
The Boston Bombing is also being wrapped up in “official false flag narratives”with a content, that justifies the question whether those who plan a false flag“event” are presumed to be too naive to also disseminate the official “alternative cover-up”.
Its time to step back to ground zero and the initial reports of the Washington Post who reported about a Saudi suspect, and then consider, that even this may in fact be covering up for a much more obvious Saudi connection, which leads directly to the House of Saud and Prince Alwaleed.
Beside that, why is it, that we don´t hear anything about the fact, that the uncle of the purported bombers, or patsies, is a former contractor with ties to Haliburton?
Boston Marathon. Photo via RT
The First Reports, the Saudi National and the “Contractor-Types”.
Shortly afterward they were again photographed, with devices in their hands which could resemble detonators. A car drove up to the finish line of the Marathon, apparently belonging to or relatedto the“contractor-types”. As it often is the case, the truth is often hidden right before our very eyes, and the key to it, is most likely in one of the first photographs which were circulated in LandDestroyer´s article.
Contractors, the CRAFT of Manufacturing a False Flag.
Thanks to the fact that alternative media are becoming increasingly awake, aware and professional in their work, and thanks to the fact that the Boston Marathon Bombing was one of the most photographed terrorist attacks ever to be committed on US soil, it became soon possible to identify details about the “contractor-types”uniform, including their caps. Apparently, the logo on the caps tied the “contractor-types”to the security contractor firm Craft International, founded by a Chris Kyle.
Professor James H. Fetzer wrote an in depth editorial, also published on nsnbc international, under the headline“Some hard Lessons from the Boston Bombing. Bombing a Staged Event”. Prof. Fetzer´s brilliant article, describes the background of Craft international, the death of the founder and owner of the company, Chris Kyle, and it reveals apparent attempts to obfuscate some of the photos which were circulated, by photoshopping the CRAFT logo on one of the caps so it was no longer clearly identifiable.
The article also details that the two suspects, whom we will discuss below, most likely have been set up as patsies, comparable to Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination. Prof. Fetzer, a philosopher of science and an expert in logical reasoning, is also asking the hard questions which need to be asked and answered or acted upon. Questions, which could be rephrased into, whether Americans want to reclaim their country from the clutches of fascism and how. What Prof. Fetzer missed, because he was not yet aware of a photo that would be sent to the scribe, is the fact that the Saudi connection was clearly visible, right under everybody´s noses so to speak. One more thing that must be taken into account is, that Craft is selling both caps and clothing via it´s website and anyone could have bought the “contractor-type”outfit on the open market to lead everyone on a wild goose chase. Also this, among many other details warrants a profound investigation.
The Bloodless Amputation. The legs were literally being pulled away under the official narrative.
Tsarnaev Brothers, The Perfect Patsies, Dead Man Walking and an Uncle with Haliburton Ties.
Approximately simultaneously with the alternative media´s discovering of ever more details which made it clear, that the Boston Marathon Bombing was a false flag and that the official narrative was rapidly falling apart, the message about the purported perpetrators, a couple of brothers with“Chechen” background was released through the mainstream media.
The two brothers, who had come to the USA about ten years earlier were the perfect distraction and they are still, in US, western as well as Russian media described as the perpetrators who committed the grisly acts of murder with a “weapon of mass destruction”. In a less propagandistic language one would say a“smoke-bomb” to lay a smoke screen.However, a camera had apparently caught the two red-handed, but the camera does not reveal anything about their motivation, nor does it reveal anything about who else eventually may have been involved.
Another problem with the story is, that the mother of the two “homegrown Chechen terrorists” stated that the FBI had been observing “every move and step of the two brothers for years”, and that even though the FBI first denied it, the FBI had been in contact with them before.
It’s now becoming clear that members of the Boston bomb squad had advanced noticeof the horrific bombing that took place at the marathon today. As an eyewitness reports, once the bombs went off, officials began announcing, “this is just a drill!” This logically means they were all informed of the “bomb drill” beforehand. Otherwise, why would they respondwith, “this is just a drill” ?
According to Local15TV.com, a University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach said there were bomb-sniffing dogs at both the start and finish lines, long before any explosions went off. He said:
“They kept making announcements on the loudspeaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”
The official story of the bombing is that terrorists detonated two bombs at the marathon finish line and that the Boston bomb squadmagically located a third bomb one mile away, identified the bomb, rigged it with explosives and initiated a “controlled explosion” all in less than an hour!(Absurd.)
The official story sounds like nothing more than a cover story.
Here are some of the facts we know so far
1) Bomb-sniffing dogs were present at the start of the race and the finish line, even before bombs went off.
2) The reported arrest of a “Saudi national” has now been retracted. Apparently that was a mistake published by the NY Post.
3) Instead, the mainstream media is pushing a new narrative that blames “right-wing extremists” for the bombing, even without a shred of evidence to back that up.
4) It is impossible for a bomb squad to have located, analyzed, rigged and detonated the third bomb in under an hour,especially when it was located one mile away, at the Kennedy Presidential Library.
See the map, below:
Why did the Boston bomb squad know all this in advance?
Given these facts, ask yourself: Who is the most likely culprit in the bombing?
The Boston bomb squad clearly had advanced notice of the presence of the bombs at the marathon, and they also had advanced notice of the location of the bomb at the Kennedy Presidential Library.
There are two reasonable explanations for this:
1) Someone called in a warning and threatened to bomb the event, which is why the bomb squad was on scene.
2) The bomb squad carried out the bombingas a false flag operation to achieve a political goal(unleashing TSA on the streets, blaming right wingers, increasing the bomb squad budget, etc.).
For explanation number one: If a credible threat had been called in, why didn’t theBoston police cancel the marathon or try to warn runners about the security threat? Is it their policy to allow people to jog right into a massacre they’ve already been warned about?
For the second explanation, there are all sorts of reasons why the Boston bomb squad might have placed the bombs at the marathon. It could have been a drill that went terribly wrong (i.e. no explosions were planned but they accidentally went off), or it could have been a deliberate attempt toterrorize the American people and justify armed TSA agents on the streets for all future sporting events.
This looks more and more like a planned event to justify a TSA lock down
Although it’s still a bit early to know for certain, this looks more and more like aplanned event that was deployed by the Boston bomb squad, called a “drill,” then used as a pretext for the President to call for TSA agentsto be on the streets at all future sporting events.
And that, in turn, is the run-up to the TSA occupation of America, which has always been the goal of Obama. Remember that back on the campaign trail, he announced he wanted to build a “civilian national security force.”
where Obama says:
“We’ve gotta have a civilian national security force that’s just a powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded…”
The fastest way to build a domestic national security force is to stage domestic bombings as a pretext. More and more, that seems to be what unfolded today in Boston.
Regardless of what you might think is behind this right now, the real proof will be found in what Obama calls for in responseto the bombings.
If he calls for TSA on the streets of America to “keep everybody safe” at sporting events, then it’s all clearly a false flag rolled out for a political purpose. It was all a pretext to justify a TSA lock down.
If the bombing is used to frame and blame veterans, patriots or “right-wing extremists,” then it’s clearly a false flag, too. Veterans and patriots have been severely demonized by the Obama administration as well as the leftist media.
If the administration avoids using the bombings to roll out its political agenda, then it might have legitimately been a random terrorist attack by a deranged individual. We’ll have to wait and see what Obama calls for in reaction to the attacks in order to know their true political purpose.
When Gaddafi’s regime fell, the Libyan rebels quickly set up new infrastructure, including a CENTRAL BANK and an OIL company. These moves — as well as lingering questions about the nature of the rebel movement — have fueled numerous conspiracy theories. But is there any grain of truth to claims that contradict the prevailing narrative?
It’s the end of Matt and Ben’s week on Libya, but the guys still have loads of stuff they didn’t get the chance to explore. Listen in to Stuff They Don’t Want You To Know and learn some quick facts about Libya’s oil reserves, some rumors that didn’t make it into the show, and some updates about their blogs.
More than two decades later, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland is still officially considered the work of Libya. For decades Libya had been at odds with Western powers, and was often considered a rogue state that sponsored terrorism, so it was no surprise that Libya would be a prime suspect in this tragic event. However, a growing number of people argue that Libya wasn’t actually responsible — and that Western intelligence agencies know the real culprit, but kept the information secret. Why?
A few days ago Spain’s National Radio interviewed a renowned expert on Middle Eastern politics and North Africa which stated that “Libya is in a process of democratic transition with some problems” and that “the most important thing is that it has one hundred percent recovered crude supply. “
Hearing these manifestations of an expert on Spanish public radio, the average Spanish interprets the “humanitarian war” was a success and that the Libyan people got rid of their tyrant and has control of its natural resources.
Nothing is further from reality, because Libya, who enjoyed the Human Development Index highest in Africa and perhaps was one of the few countries in the developing world development had full control of their natural resources, especially oil, gas and Gold today is a failed state where Islamist militias roam terrorizing the population.Meanwhile, oil and gas wells have been literally surrounded by two lines of heavily armed mercenaries say predatory corporations working at full capacity.
But the death of Muammar, who so cynically held by Hillary Clinton was off camera at an interview , the worst was yet to come.
Part of the jihadists and insurgents mercenaries were sent to Turkey, where they would be trained to jointhe Free Syrian Army , while another large contingent of jihadists with sophisticated weaponry supplied by NATO and also looted the arsenals of Gaddafi, was sent south to Salafists join the AQIM (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb) and Tuareg nationalists, to instruct them in the Holy War and initiate the destabilization of the entire region surrounding the Sahara Desert, so rich in natural resources.
Tuareg tribes who had been previously trained militarily by a U.S.command, and have integrated oddly shaped nationalism and Salafism to be led by international jihadist and AQIM guerrillas under the command of which have devastated the country’s north within days imposing Sharia in all the cities under their control, as happened in Somalia militiaAl Chabab few years ago.
It’s just another phase of AFRICOM led by France and commanded and coordinatedjointly by the U.S. intelligence services, English and French, in which the French nation has acted again as arsonist-fireman, as he did in Libya under Sarkozy’s right-wing mandate.
This time, however, paradoxically, has been the ‘socialist’ François Hollande in charge of fire and plunge the region into chaosand anarchy, using Islamist groups as a tactic before Western military intervention in support of the subsequent intensification the planned sacking of West and Central Africa. One more example of the double standards prevailing in international politics.
This new episode of ‘war on terror’ in favor of democracy and human rights to justify a new international interferencehideth blatant profit that is usually satisfied in three phases whenever conflict is artificially created from the outside.A first selling weapons to both sides, a second settling and plundering the resources of the “liberated country”, and a third rebuilding infrastructure will most likely be destroyed again in a few years.
The new phase of AFRICOM has just begun, and the strategy has scored two great goals geoeconomic. The first is that the financial crisis plaguing Europe especially to be paid by the poorest of the global world. The second, and perhaps more important, is to counter the growing economic power, China’s financial and commercial on the African continent.
And to get it, not hesitate to create new conflicts in countries like Algeria, Niger, Chad, Nigeria and others.
While Salafi Islamists are considered terroristsand a great danger to the international community in Mali,the same in Syria are considered revolutionary for democracy. (****I mean you must be an idiot if you can understand what’s going on! On the one hand the west are financing the salafists to destroy Syria while on the other hand they are considered terrorists my ass!! really wake up people they are feeding you BS its time to get up and turn off your T.V and get out and start protesting against your government because what America/Israel they are pushing Europe to war and unless you, yes YOU, I AM TALKING TO YOU, WHO YOU ARE READING MY BLOG, WAKE UP AND DO SOMETHING before it’s too late stop thinking of islamophobia which they have implanted through the media and made you hate anything to do with muslims same here about christians its time to join forces and become one. We have nothing to divide God is one whether I call him Allah or God its the same, do not let some bigots and warmonger divide us just for them to make more money while you and I lose our children.)
The recolonization of Africa began with the death of Gaddafi (Part 2)
The exploitation of Africa began centuries ago by Arab-Muslim slave traders, and intensified a century after the arrival of Europeans in America, when slavery was the basis of holding colonies ‘new continent’ American.
In the eighteenth century, slavery went from coast to explorationand subsequent progressive conquest of Africa by the European powers, which would end up sharing the continent with the Treaty of Berlin, 1877.
Decolonization began after World War I and was consolidated after the second. But the colonial powers, especially Britain and France, continued to control the continent economically through puppet governments and corrupt.
In the late nineties China appears as unexpected new player in the African region and started a war based geo economic competition for African resources and markets.
Africa had hitherto been the major supplier of mineral products consumed by industry ‘first world’, especially hydrocarbons, but also gold, diamonds, platinum, uranium, iron, copper, coltan, sulphates and zinc.
Meanwhile, it has long been called ‘third world’ was the scene of bloody wars in which child soldiers were involved, as well as famine and mass displacementof populations that were always forgotten by the media. Their countries were often ruled by elites subservient and heavily protected that enslaved their people while they were living in opulence.
The Chinese presence has been ‘crescendo’ since early 2000, when the Iraq war and sanctions on Iran would deprive him of much-needed oil supplies for industry, as the ‘factory of the world’ needs natural resources and new markets to export their products and services ‘low cost’.
The ‘soft colonization’ of China is based on obtaining raw materials in exchange for loans at a low-interest rate for infrastructure construction under the direction of Chinese engineers.
In 2000 was held the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) in Beijing,which meant the formalization in the international sphere of Chinese claims in Africa. The result was the signing of contracts worth millions and investment for development in several African countries.
Since that date, loans granted by China have a larger capital to an interest rate lower than those granted by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the U.S. and the European Union. On the other hand, have already put the groundwork for the creation of an African Development Bank funded with Chinese capital.
Today, hundreds of Chinese companies managed by a diaspora of more than a million Chinese citizens are established in different African countries.
China, in parallel with the progressive commercial and financial implementation in Africa, has also been culturally implanted through its Confucius Institutes, as a way to spread knowledge of the Chinese language and culture in order to enhance mutual understanding of face a future exchange. In this sense, the great Asian giant adopts the same strategy of cultural diplomacy that are being implemented for several years Britain and France, with the institutions of the British Council and the Institut Français, respectively. Also Spain has exploited this strategy with its network of Cervantes Institutes spread all over the world.
China’s entry into an area of influence was exclusively Western geostrategic implications from the outset. The creation of AFRICOM was the natural reaction of the Pentagon and the European Union, aware that international economic hegemony of resources depends largely African.
The partition of Sudan and occupation of Libya , both for energy manifests, has been followed by the French-led operation in Mali , whose uranium feed many of the more than forty Gallic country’s nuclear plants.
Nagham Salman is head of European research and policy analyst specializing in Middle Eastern affairs.
Footage of hundreds of armoured trucks, similar to ones reportedly purchased recently by the Department Of Homeland Security has appeared online, raising more questions over their intended use.
The video was uploaded to YouTube last week by a user who stated that it was shot in the middle of the desert between Hackberry and Peach Springs, Arizona.
It shows hundreds of military style trucks loaded on to a train, presumably in the process of being delivered domestically for law enforcement or military purposes.
The video raises significant questions in the wake of reports that the Department of Homeland Security, headed by Janet Napolitano, recently purchased around 2,700 MRAP trucks that many believe are to be deployed to local law enforcement agencies around the country.
It is clear that the DHS does have fleets of armoured vehicles intended for use in the US.
Here is a demonstration video of such a vehicle by ICE agents:
Does the latest video show these same type of trucks in the process of being delivered?
The footage is the latest in a spate of similar videos to surface on the internet in recent months showing huge amounts of military equipment packed onto trains en route within the US.
As we reported today, the DHS’ mass arms build-up continues, with the report that the agency has bought another 360,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition to add to the roughly 2 billion bullets already bought over the past year.
Such stark activity with little to no background detail has prompted several Congressmen to ask the federal government for an explanation. According to some elected representatives, the DHS has refused to answer specific questions on the purchases, stating only that the ammunition is for “training purposes” over the next five years, and has been bulk ordered to save money.
As we have pointed out numerous times however, military experts have noted that hollow point bullets are unsuitable for training, and are much more expensive than full metal jackets.
Efforts by government media mouthpieces to dismiss the story have only caused it to become more viral.
The DHS has also purchased 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles, as well as cementing a $2 million dollar relationship with a contractor that recently had to apologize for producing shooting targets of pregnant women, children and elderly gun owners depicted in residential settings.
The DHS has also been busy buying large supplies of body armor, leading to shortages. Last year, the agency put out an urgent order for “riot gear” in anticipation of civil unrest. The agency has also ordered bullet-proof checkpoint booths and hired hundreds of new security guards to protect government buildings over the course of the last 12 months. None of this has been addressed by the mainstream media.
It is necessary that men should understand things as they are, should call them by their right names, and should know that an army is an instrument for killing, and that the enrollment and management of an army...is a preparation for murder - Tolstoy