Great Britain, whose participation in the destabilization of Libya – under the pretext of the release of the “dictatorship” – was decisive, along with France, the United States and its NATO allies are now in fear that “some places in this country have become unsafe for its citizens.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs was asked to leave Benghazi, who was, however, the “capital” of the conspiracy”, the famous” media as a “rebellion”.
Where these changes in the behaviour of the West against Libya soon? It all started, according to them, the attack on “consulate” U.S. in Benghazi, September 11, 2012. Four Americans, including the Ambassador of the United States, Libya, Christopher Stevens, died in the attack, which was part of a wave of violence against diplomats, military and police.
The murder of the U.S. ambassador has caused great commotion in the West as the Libyans, Islamists, could not go to bang Gaddafist ambassador, their “liberator”,knowing full well the role of the ambassador to the NATO aggression against Libya?
Once the surprise was that the West had to understand the obvious,except for a few cities are not safe anywhere in Libya, not to speak of Benghazi. Less than two weeks before (January 12), the Italian consul in Benghazi, escaped an attempt assassination. Guido De Sanctis when going home after work, several bullets from another car hit the car and its driver diplomat, but the car was armoured.
This time, the British were under threat. ”We are aware of a specific or imminent threat to the West in Benghazi, and urge all British citizens, who are there to leave the city immediately.”
The British embassy in Tripoli, contacted British citizens to alert them to this end, “the foreign ministry said in a statement that does not specify the nature of the threat. Warnings Algeria to the NATO aggression against Libya were true, this country is in chaos, and became a rear base for terrorism.
Reliable sources indicate that the terrorist group that attacked the gas plant in Tigventurine, close Aminasa, had “a few days” in Libyan territory, with the support of the thefts “without the knowledge of the central government,” which can not control their country.
On Friday, Australia, meanwhile, issued a warning to its citizens, citing “concrete and imminent danger”.
“There is a risk of retaliatory attacks against Western targets in Libya“ after the French intervention in Mali, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. According to the ministry, two Australians, registered in Benghazi and 22 in total, in Libya.
According to AFP, these solutions were enraged by Deputy Interior Minister Abdullah Masoud, who believed that “there is no reason to warn London“:
“We recognize that there are security problems in Benghazi, and within a few months … But there is no new information to justify the reaction of London”, – told AFP: “Instead now we have to.” Create our power “in the East and all over Libya,” – he said, expressing “surprise” “very muscular” actions in London.
Source: Algérie patriotique
Having destroyed and murdered thousands of Libyans THE WEST are asking their NATIONAL FLEE FROM BENGHAZI
LIBYA Australian and British leave Benghazi threatened by Salafist groups Jihadists 25.01.13
1 – All forcibly displaced families need access to return to Bani Walid, in their home town and to prevent bandits infiltrated the city made the looting and burning of houses in Bani Walid …
2 – The whole family Warfalla rejects the claims of the “government” to move them to a field in the Tahwerga, first because we will not abandon our city and second by Tahwerga has its own inhabitants who were cruelly forced out of their city .. .
3 – Calling all DD.HH organizations and civil organization of the Red Cross and Red Crescent and United Nations to cooperate fully and return of people to their area of the city of Bani Walid …
4 – The whole of the Warfalla tribe and noble families in all areas of Libya to act in unity and strength against what is happening in Bani Walid- ethnic cleansing and expulsion of residents who the traitors, thieves and mercenaries from Misurata conducted in the city of Bani Walid
5 – The Tribe Warfala in all regions of Libya requires establishing committees to collect a sum of money in 150 dinars,at least for each family Warfala, and there is no prohibition for those who want to pay more than this amount. This confirms that they have not waived their tribe, and deserve praise for their willingness to work with us. Remember that these funds will be used for the rehabilitation and construction of the city of Bani Walid, mother, and we hope that Congress “national” rule on the restoration of Bani Walid after demolished houses over the heads of its inhabitants .. .
6 – Invoke the nobles and elders of Libya, who have seen the tragedy of Bani Walid, especially the elders of the western mountains to urgently take immediate steps for the release of members of the Board of the Tribe Warfala, including Sheikh Mohammed Barghouti, who was kidnapped by mercenariesof Congress “National” and elements of “security l serving government”
Tribal Social Council Social Warfala Friday 26/10/2012
- Green Resistance condemns the deathof Mohammed Nasrallah Seer of the tribe of the sons of Sheikh Zlitenafter being tortured in prisons illegalmilitias government.
Thousands of civilians of Bani Walid forced out of their city
Civilian survivors of the tribe of Bani Walid Rafla displaced
After the genocide orchestrated and silenced by the invading powers
Dr. Hamza Tohamani – Nations addresses the world
A Civilian from Bani Walid who was kidnapped by mercenaries from Misurata accounts: managed to escape and was subjected for 3 days to cruel torture and said that he witnessed hundreds were subjected to torture and then disappeared.
NATO’s military campaign in Libya is remarkable, among other things, for the following two reasons.
First – the damage that the air raids by the Western anti-Gaddafi alliance caused to Libya is estimated to be 7 times bigger than the damage which bombing by the Nazis caused in Europe during WWII.
Second – Muammar Gaddafi and his associates had, in total, $ 150 bln on bank accounts in various parts of the world. After the beginning of the Libyan revolution, the West froze these accounts. Now, this money has disappeared somewhere.
Russian expert in Eastern affairs Anatoly Egorin tries to analyze these two cases in his recently published book, titled “The Ousting of Muammar Gaddafi. A Libyan Diary. 2011-2012.”
Speaking about the damage which Western bombing attacks caused to Libya, one may probably say that every war causes damage. This is true, but the amount of damage can be greater or smaller. It may be doubted that the ousting of Gaddafi, however tyrannical he might have been, was really worth the damage which NATO bombs caused to Libya – to say nothing of the fact that introducing a no-fly zone over a country and then bombing it is, to put it mildly, not very consistent.
However, the sum which Gaddafi and his associates had in bank accounts, and which the West, in fact, has stolen – $ 150 bln – might have been enough to reconstruct the Libyan infrastructure after the damage caused by the bombs – if not fully, then, at least, partially. But now, that money has disappeared. Why and where? Here is what Anatoly Egorin says:
“The West most likely decided right after the very startof the anti-Gaddafi rebellion in Libya to do whatever possible to prevent Gaddafi from staying in power. His and his associates’ bank accounts were immediately frozen. Or, it would be probably better to say that it was only officially announced that they were frozen, but in reality they were stolen. Nobody can say for sure precisely who stole this money and where it is now. There is only some vague information that it was allegedly pocketed by the bankers themselves and that these bankers allegedly tried to launder this money in offshore zones.Attempts to find this money are now under way, but I doubt that it will ever be found.”
“However,” Mr. Egorin continues, “it would be wrong to say that only the West has stolen the money of the former Libyan regime. It is known that those people who fought against Gaddafi and who are now in power in Libya have conveyed many trucks literally stuffed with money abroad.”
The Head of the International Association for Democracy in Libya Fatima Abu An-Niran confirmswhat Mr. Egorin says:
“The chaotic situation in Libya enabled everyone to steal anything that lay in his or her temptation’s way. The West was quite aware of that, but didn’t try to stop it. I can back my words with facts, and the former head of Libya’s Central Bank can also confirm this.”
“The $ 150 bln on Gaddafi’s and other former Libyan leaders’ bank accounts is not the only money that was stolen during the period of anarchy in Libya,” Ms. an-Niran continues. “Lots of money was trafficked and is still being trafficked abroad by the Libyan “revolutionaries” themselves. To a large extent, the situation in Libya still remains chaotic. The new authorities seem to be incapable of controlling the situation in many of the country’s provinces. These provinces are in fact controlled by groups of bandits who do whatever they want with those who try to resist them.”
“When the West threw bombs on Libya, Western politicians said that this allegedly was done to help Libyans oust the tyrant and establish democracy in their country,” Ms. an-Niran says. “Now, it has turned out that these words were mere demagogy. The real aim of the West was to try to steal Libya’s riches.”
True, it looks like now that Gaddafi has been ousted, the West doesn’t care anymore about what is happening in Libya.It also looks like the current Libyan leaders care more about staying in their posts – or occupying higher posts if possible – than about trying to return the $ 150 bln which mysteriously disappeared back into their country, which now badly needs restoration after the war.
ALGERIA ISP / Elmokawama According to Akhbar Libya, to Laejilete,Walid Souissi the rebelwas killed by the Green Resistance in the region Jadida.
In the city of Zawiya, a shell fell on a housekilling a pregnant woman and destroyed their car parked near the house.
A video filmed in the operating room of the rebels at the launch of the invasion of Tripoli. A rebel in contact with NATO that the needle on the areas to bomb.
ALGERIA ISP / Elmokawama According to Akhbar Libya, this morning at dawn, a suicide car bomb targeted the headquarters of the military police of the army of NTC in the heart of Tripoli near the mosque Abourkiba.
A caricature of the rebels on the plane of the NATO war that killed thousands of Libyans.
The Resistance Fighters threw grenades at a checkpoint located on the airport road.
A convoy of heavy weapons from rebels Zenten goes to the city of Mezda as reinforcements to the rebels of Kantrar.Their mission is to kill the young of Mezda.
The youth of the tribe Ouled Boussif have closed the south entrance of the city Mezda to prevent the rebels from returning Zenten.
By Christof Lehmann — nsnbc. Yesterday, on 19 March 2012, Amnesty International was calling on NATO to “investigate the killing of dozens of civilians during it`s air campaign last year and to provide reparations to the people affected”. Amnesty further stated that “adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to the victims and their families”. NATO rebutted Amnesty International`s call for an investigation and compensation for the “dozens” of civilians, and in doing so, NATO has entered an elegant propaganda dance macabre. A propaganda dance macabre, designed to dominate and more importantly direct the public and political discourse away from the true dimensions and proportions of the war crimes that were committed under NATO command as well as command responsibility.
The “human rights organization” that is branding itself as “watchdog” is obviously attempting to make even well intended humanitarian minded members of the worlds public belief, that NATO`s Operation Unified Protector, authorized by UNSC Resolution 1973 has resulted in 55 documented cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women that were killed in air strikes in the capital Tripoli and the towns of Zliten,Majer, Sirte, and Brega. The amnesty narrative must make the heart of every NATO propaganda expert jump faster. Possibly, Amnesty is positioning itself for a Nobel Peace Price, where it would be in perfect company with Barak Hussein Obama, Henry Kissinger and other humanitarian avatars. After all, Amnesty International USA has Suzanne Nossel at the helm. A Hilary Clinton aide for International Organizations Affairs.
Reality Amnesty-Style is depended on the all important methodology. With the correct methodology it is possible to reduce a genocide to 55 documented cases …
Free invitation to Obama, Hilary Clinton, Senator McCain, Suzanne Rice, Cameron, Sarkozy, Bernard-Henri Levi, Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani to Live the Arabic Spring in Libya.
To Feel and touch the greatest result of the so-called Revolution was made by rats Oh Sorry, I mean rebels (no freedom fighters) because I remember you saying innocent people (rebels).
Welcome to the hell (Libya), choose any area in Libya and come to enjoy with us the explosions sounds:
1 explosion per minute, don’t worry it’s one of the rebels trying to storm a camp or innocent house to steal a car, or to rape his daughter, or it’s one of the members of Zintan fighting against a member of Souq Jumma or Misurata rebels fighting against of Benghazi in the city, or it might be a member of Benghazi wants money from the bank , or they want to capture someone because he is supporter of Gaddafi .
I promise you if you go to the Beach I want you to see the nice view of the sea in Tripoli, Oh! please don’t be Surprised if you see one of the Al Qaeda members they are so lovely, they only KILL single girlswho go with their family to the sea because they consider this a disbelief, don’t be shock if you see armed gangs kidnapping a girl or boy they only want money to hand this innocent son or daughter to his family .
If you don’t like the view from Tripoli let’s go to Benghazi, don’t be surprised if you see some rebels raping a French or a UK journalist it’s normal and everyday such things happens, I think it’s happening in your country too right?
Anyway don’t fear if you see someone killing others calm down ok ? Nothing will hurt you, just turn a blind eye .
If you don’t like it let’s go to any restaurant, yes if you have weapon we will take anything free, have you any? Oh don’t worry if you haven’t anyway someone of Al Zintan or Benghazi or Misurata will storm in the restaurant to take the food for his partners and the owner will shake and ask us to leave, don’t worry we just have to go at 10 am the rats oh sorry the rebels usually come at 10:30 am.
If you want to go to a hotel, my advice to you is to be in the middle of the city because we can only hear explosions from far distance and if you want to see it we can go to the center of the city but please remember we have to be back to the hotel at 6 pm other wise you will be kidnapped and you if are a diplomatic man there will be another Military intervention .
Do you have Visa card? Don’t bring it because there is No ATM machine working they are all destroyed, sorry to tell you this but the rats ( rebels ) are thieves .
If you couldn’t sleep at night because of the sounds of the clashes don’t be upset you will get used to it in three days, because we completed the course of NATO, yes believe me all Eight months you were bombing us we got used to sleep while your Military aircraft bombed Libya .
When they want something, the US and its allies will insist until they get it. That’s what they’re doing to Syria right now,where they NEED to give it a Libya-like treatment in order to further their Imperial Overdrive goals in the Middle East.
Just as rock star Freddy Mercury & Queen used to sing “we will, we will rock you!!”, today’s US/UK/EU/Israeli war cry mantra goes something like this: “We will, we will BOMB you!!”. And if they can’t do the bombing “officially” themselves or through NATOas they’ve done in Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq,Serbia or Pakistan, then they’ll do the bombing through suitable proxies, especially their present favorite errand-boy Al-Qaeda. (***<=>It’s Parent’s are CIA + MOSSAD =Israeli Intelligence Mossad – one of the children is Al Qaeda)
We may be seeing examples of this in the horrendous attacks taking place inside Syria which the Western powers and media systematically blame solely on the Bashar al-Assad government,which from the very beginning of the “Arab Spring” warned his country and the world against Western covert operations and a powerful media PsyWar.
Common sense tell us that it would be monstrous and idiotic for al-Assad to purposely carry out such attacks that only play into the hands of the Western powers giving them further excuse for armed intervention. The Houla massacre came just as UN Special Envoy to Syria Kofi Annan was beginning his mission inside Syria; now the el-Quebeir killing comes just as Annan is about to submit his report to the UN Security Council. It makes no sense, so one must ask:who benefits from all this?
Clearly, the Annan Mission is being sabotaged and – oh, coincidence – his proposed plan is the only one that counts with Russian and Chinese support after these two countries blocked US, British and French attempts at imposing a Libya-like Resolution 1973 against Syriaat the end of 2011 and early 2012, which would have predictably led to Libya-like results in Syria.
Annan proposes a six-point planthat includes cessation of hostilities and Syrian-led dialogue amongst ALL warring parties, unrestrained access of humanitarian aid, freedom for journalists to report what’s really happening and UN monitoring. Naturally, that does not please Hilary, Obama, Cameron, Hague, John MacCain, Joe Liberman and their controllers at AIPAC –American Israeli Public Affairs Committee– for it thwarts Western invasion plans against Syria.
So the Annan Plan MUST be sabotaged. And what better way to do that then to carry out covert dirty tricksfalse flag-like horrendous killings as we’ve seen in Houla, Hama, and now el-Quebeir,putting all the blame, naturally, on“the Assad regime’s repressive troops”giving it the goriest of Western media coverage?
But who are fighting inside Syria? We hear about a“Free Syrian Army”, “Local Coordination Committees”, a “Syrian National Council” and – most notably – good old Al-Qaeda. All wonderfully armed, trained, financed and supported by the Western Powersand Media and by groups like the UK-based“Syrian Observatory on Human Rights”,all suitably“appalled” and “outraged” over the killings and massacres.
What options doesa country’s legitimate government such as Syria’s have when confronted with civil war? Basically, two: they either fight the imported armed insurrection or they surrender and give up their country to the US, UK, NATO military,together with their darlings at ExxonMobil, Goldman Sachs, Blackstone, and Halliburton… They call it“democracy”, and we’ve seen where that leads to in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.
So now the Western Powers are having a temper tantrum and want to see “regime change”in Syria one way or another. If Russia and China blocked NATO bombings, well then let’s just bring in the Al-Qaeda “SWAT”Team and other “freedom fighting”thugs so they can do the bombing for us.
Isn’t it strange that over the past two years Hilary Clinton has publicly admitted on FoxNews and CNN that it was the US who “created, trained and armed Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan to fight the Soviet invasion of the 80’s”, and that “once the Soviets left, we just washed our hands and left the Taliban, Muhadejeen and Al-Qaeda with all those Stinger missiles and arms” running around Afghanistan?
Wasn’t it Tony Blair’s Foreign Secretary Robin Cook who told The Guardian newspaper in June 2005 that“Al Qaeda was created by the US and the name means ‘the file’” – the CIA file containing lists of all those cute Al-Qaeda operatives? Too bad for big-mouth Robin as he promptly “died of a heart attack” just two months later in rather dubious circumstances…
Wasn’t it Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinksi – co-founder and ideologue of the Rockefeller/Rothschild Trilateral Commission – who told the French “Nouvelle Observateur” magazine in 1998 that he masterminded the CIA’s “Operation Cyclone”which in early July 1979 whipped-up Taliban fighters against the pro-soviet regime in Kabul, thus triggering the soviet invasion of Afghanistan; boasting with president Carter that the soviets now had their Vietnam War?. All trained, financed, armed and supported by the US, Saudi Arabia, UK, Pakistan and Israel?
So, is it any surprise that over the past year and a half of “Arab Spring”, we hear many times that Al-Qaeda is involved in the worst fighting, even raising their flag over a police facility in “liberated Libya”? Now we learn Al-Qaeda is working hard to “liberate”Syria…
How much of the horrific killing is attributable to them and their insurrection partnerswhich, in the final instance all goes back to their original controllers at the CIA, MI6 and Mossad?
Is it a mere coincidence that during the secretive Bilderberg meeting earlier this month in Chantilly, Virginia (USA) that brought together key global power brokers and decision-makers of this world, they also invited Bassma Kodmani, member of the Executive Bureau and Head of Foreign Affairs at the Syrian National Council to attend?
Surely Mr Kodmani must have met and chatted with other Bilderberg attendees like Henry Kissinger, the “black prince” Richard Perle of Destroy-Iraq-fame, and key think-tank bosses like the Council of Foreign Relations’ Robert Rubin,Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Hudson and Hoover institutes, the neo-con American Enterprise Institute and – oh, yes! – Thomas Donilon, Obama’s powerful national security advisor…
The message is clear, gentlemen: this is Total War. So, Syria, if we cannot bomb you to smithereensand impose regime change with UN and NATO backingas we did in Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya,then we’ll use our proxies at the Syrian National Council and call in our Al-Qaeda Global SWAT team killers.
Either way, Hilary, Obama, Hague and Cameron will rock‘n’rollto the tune of “We will, we will BOMB you!!! Who’s directing the orchestra you ask? I think I see Bibi Netanyahu and the AIPAC and ADL boys playing the strings there, behind the curtain…
Adrian Salbuchi for RT
Adrian Salbuchi is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina. www.asalbuchi.com.ar
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
On November 2, 2010 France and Great Britain signed a mutual defence treaty, which included joint participation in “Southern Mistral” (www.southern-mistral.cdaoa.fr), a series of war games outlined in the bilateral agreement. Southern Mistral involved a long-range conventional air attack, called Southern Storm, against a dictatorship in a fictitious southern country called Southland. The joint military air strike was authorised by a pretend United Nations Security Council Resolution. The “Composite Air Operations” were planned for the period of 21-25 March, 2011.On 20 March, 2011, the United States joined France and Great Britain in an air attack against Gaddafi‘s Libya, pursuant to UN Security Council resolution 1973.
Have the scheduled war games simply been postponed, or are they actually under way after months of planning, under the name of Operation Odyssey Dawn? Were opposition forces in Libya informed by the US, the UK or France about the existence of Southern Mistral/Southern Storm, which may have encouraged them to violence leading to greater repression and a humanitarian crisis? In short was this war against Gaddafi’s Libya plannedor a spontaneous response to the great suffering which Gaddafi was visiting upon his opposition?
Members of the United States Congress are wondering how much planning time it took for our own government, in concert with the UK and France,to line up 10 votes in the Security Council and gain the support of the Arab League and Nato, and then launch an attack on Libya without observing the constitutional requirement of congressional authorisation.
Libya was attacked, we have been told, because Gaddafi allegedly had killed 6,000 of his own people. But is this true?It should be remembered that in 2006, a full 18 years after the Lockerbie bombing, the US lifted sanctions against Libya,which was welcomed back into the international fold.
Now, as Gaddafi faces armed internal opposition backed by a UN Security Council resolution and faces powerful external opposition backed by the military of the US, the UK and France, he is told he must give up power. But to whom? What is the end game?
The US has been dancing around the regime change issue,(since that is not sanctioned by the UNSC Resolution) but as in most cases one has to watch where the bombs are falling to determine whether or not regime change is the policy.
The newest argument for regime change is that if he is not ousted Gaddafi can be expected to attempt Lockerbie-type retaliation against the west in response to the attacks seeking to oust him.
This bloody enterprise is beginning to sound a lot like Iraq: “Saddam was killing his own people, will kill his people, or will kill us if we don”t get him first.”
So did the Bush Administration pump up the fears of the American people that we were next, that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and had the intention and capability of attacking the United States.
The Iraq war begins its ninth year at a long term cost to US taxpayers of in excess of $3 trillion.The intelligence making the case for the war was “sexed up”. President Bush and Vice President Cheney made a false case for war. An expensive lie. In the name of saving the people of Iraq, we bombed the country, invaded, changed the regime and it is still a carnival of death. In the end it was China, not involved in the war, which received a multi-billion oil deal.
The war in Afghanistan, with no end in sight, has already run a decade and will inevitably cost trillions.
The war against Libya will cost the US $1 billion for the first week.
But we in America are being assured that since Nato is taking over, our role will change. In addition to funding the Libyan war from our own Pentagon resources, the US provides 25% of the funding of Nato, the UK 9.1%, France 8.72%. For all intents and purposes the coalition is handing control of the war over — to itself.
As the funding switches to Nato, we in the US will get the Libyan war at a 75% discount, and our allies in the UK and France will have to pay considerable sums from their own treasuries for a war which is sure to cost billions.Of the 28 members of Nato, I think of Iceland which provides 0.0450 of Nato’s military budget. If member nations are assessed accordingly, poor Iceland, whose economy has imploded, LINK FOR REST
LIBYA EU MP Exposes “Humanitarian”War: Preplanned, Atrocity Lie, Illegal, Shreds UN Charter
Video is on legitimacy of UN resolution for military action that violates UN charter. The UN charter says military intervention is legal if a state violates the peace & international security, none of which happened in Libya. In addition there is no international rule allowing military intervention for the protection of civilians.A proposed law like this should be examined & discussed before being approved as law but no rule like this presently exist. The EU MP adds there was no atrocity commited in Libya as we have found out from documents.Claims of 10,000 dead Libyan as reported the evidence of this is not found. The former EU MP further adds that this was a preplanned aggression between France & Great Britain who signed an agreement in Nov 2, 2010 in which there was plans for war game, Southern Mistral, which mirrors events that took place in Libya on March 20, 2011.
Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya: Imperialist Aggression Shreds UN Charter
by Dr. Webster G. Tarpley March 22, 2011
On March 19, US and British cruise missiles joined with French and other NATO combat aircraft in Operation Odyssey Dawn/Operation Ellamy, a neo-imperialist bombing attack under fake humanitarian cover against the sovereign state of Libya. Acting under UN Security Council resolution 1973, US naval forces in the Mediterranean on Saturday night local time fired 112 cruise missiles at targets which the Pentagon claimed were related to Libya’s air defense system.But Mohammed al-Zawi, the Secretary General of the Libyan Parliament, told a Tripoli press conference that the “barbaric armed attack”and “savage aggression” had hit residential areas and office buildings as well as military targets, filling the hospitals of Tripoli and Misurata with civilian victims. Zawi accused the foreign powers of acting to protect a rebel leadership which contains notorious terrorist elements. The Libyan government repeated its request for the UN to send international observers to report objectivelyon events in Libya.
The attacking forces are expected to deploy more cruise missiles, Predator drones, and bombers, seeking to destroy the Libyan air defense system as a prelude to the systematic decimation of Libyan ground units. International observers have noted that US intelligence about Libya may be substandard, and that many cruise missiles may indeed have struck non-military targets.
Libya had responded to the UN vote by declaring a cease-fire, but Obama and Cameron brushed that aside.On Saturday, France 24 and al-Jazeera of Qatar, international propaganda networks hyping the attacks, broadcast hysterical reports of Qaddafi’s forces allegedly attacking the rebel stronghold of Bengazi. They showed a picture of a jet fighter being shot down and claimed this proved Qaddafi was defying the UN by keeping up his air strikes. It later turned out that the destroyed plane had belonged to the rebel air force.Such coverage provided justification for the bombing attacks starting a few hours later. The parallels to the Kuwait incubator babies hoax of 1990 were evident. Qaddafi loyalists said Saturday’s fighting was caused by rebel assaults on government lines in the hopes of provoking an air attack, plus local residents defending themselves against the rebels.
At the UN vote, the Indian delegate correctly pointed out that the decision to start the war had been made on the basis of no reliable information whatsoever, since UN Secretary General Ban-ki Moon’s envoy to Libya had never reported to the Security Council. The bombing started shortly after a glittering Paris summit “in support of the Libyan people,” where Sarkozy, Cameron, Hillary Clinton, Stephen Harper of Canada and other imperialist politicians had strutted and postured.
Token contingents from Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia were supposed to take part in the attack, but were nowhere to be seen, while some Arab states were expected to provide financial support. The minimum estimated cost of maintaining a no-fly zone over Libya for one year is estimated in the neighborhood of $15 billion – enough to fund WIC high-protein meals for impoverished US mothers and infants for two years.
From no-fly zone to regime change
The alleged purpose of the bombing was to establish a no-fly zone and to protect a force of CIA-sponsored Libyan rebels composed of the Moslem Brotherhood, elements of the Libyan government and army subverted LINK FOR REST
LIBYA “Humanitarian” War Based On False Evidence; International Law Is A Tool For Political Aims
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 Lies Behind the “Humanitarian War” in Libya: There is No Evidence! (Video) The Immense Criminal Enterprise Known as “Responsibility to Protect.”
Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer Activist Post
Meet Dr. Sliman Bouchuiguir, the man behind the verified pack of lies used to justify NATO’s intervention in Libya. This amazing piece of investigative journalism reveals not only how tenuous these fabrications were, but have produced Bouchuiguir himself admitting flagrantly that the allegations he made were contrived, baseless, unconfirmed, and designed specifically to give the necessary requirements for NATO’s intervention.
Furthermore, Bouchuiguir reveals his ties to both the Libyan rebel “National Transitional Council,” particularly NTC Prime Minister Mahmoud Jabril (also spelled “Gibril”) whom he cites as a source for his allegations, and the US government-funded International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH).
These associations paint a dark picture of the depths of depravity from which this war was prosecuted from. This is the justification for a “humanitarian war” where self-serving foreign interests masquerading as “international institutions” arrange for a disgruntled opposition vying for power whom they are supporting, funding, arming, and whose leaders they are harboring, to manage the perception of a given conflict to provide a predictably slanted pretext for “international intervention.”
This immense criminal enterprise, referred to as “responsibility to protect” or “R2P” is a subject now being covered in depth at colorrevolutionsandgeopolitics.blogspot.com, and a subject the public must be educated on, as “R2P” is the pretext these same interests are attempting to use against Syria and beyond.
Please visit the website of the makers of this documentary, here. For an in depth, documented look at the subject matter, please see Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya’s excellent article titled, “Lybia: Human rights impostors used to spawn NATO’s fraudulent war.”
The names change but the methods remain the same. In Iraq the imperial war facilitator was Ahmed Chalabi. In Libya he goes by the name of Soliman Bouchuiguir,a shadowy human rights figure whose baseless allegations against Gaddafi were endorsed by the UN system and its affiliated human rights agencies without the slightest verification. Each one in his own way, Nazemroaya and Teil shed light on a failed system of international law and justice, which has made itself complicit in NATO’s war crimes in Libya. Voltaire Network | 17 October 2011
The war against Libya is built on fraud. The United Nations Security Council passed two resolutions against Libya on the basis of unproven claims, specifically that Colonel Muammar Qaddafi was killing his own people in Benghazi. The claim in its exact form was that Qaddafi had ordered Libyan forces to kill 6,000 people in Benghazi. These claims were widely disseminated, but always vaguely explained.It was on the basis of this claim that Libya was referred to the U.N. Security Council at U.N Headquarters in New York City and kicked out of the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva.
False claims about African mercenary armies in Libya and about jet attacks on civilians were also used in a broad media campaign against Libya. These two claims have been sidelined and have become more and more murky. The massacre claims, however, were used in a legal, diplomatic, and military framework to justify NATO’s war on the Libyans.
Using Human Rights as a Pretext for War: The LLHR and its Unproven Claims
One of the main sources for the claim that Qaddafi was killing his own people is the Libyan League for Human Rights (LLHR). The LLHR was actually pivotal to getting the U.N. involved through its specific claims in Geneva. On February 21, 2011 the LLHR got the 70 other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to send letters to President Obama, E.U. High Representative Catherine Ashton, and the U.N. Secretary-General Ban-ki Moon demanding internationalaction against Libya invoking the “Responsibility to Protect”doctrine. Only 25 members of this coalition actually assert that they are human rights groups.
The letter is as follows:
We, the undersigned non-governmental, human rights, and humanitarian organizations, urge you to mobilize the United Nations and the international community and take immediate action to halt the mass atrocities LINK FOR REST
LIBYA MUST SEE There is no evidence of Gaddafi Crimes! (Part 1) (The humanitarian War) LIBYA ON
Jean Bricmont : The 3 victims of the lie of the humanitarian war in Libya.
LIBYA War Crimes: “Democracy” Comes To SirteBy Barrel Of Gun In “Humanitarian”War For Civilians
Sirte destroyed by NTC-NATO offensive in Libya By Chris Marsden 18 October 2011
The Libyan town of Sirte has been all but destroyed and its inhabitants turned into homeless refugees. This situation has gone largely unreported, but those press reports that have emerged paint a picture of a city being reduced to ruins by attacks of the National Transitional Council (NTC) “rebels” and NATO bombing raids against which it has no defense.
“After weeks of intense fighting, Moammar Gaddafi’s home town appeared Saturday to have been largely destroyed, with most of its population fled and holes the size of manhole covers blown in apartment buildings and the ousted leader’s showcase convention center,” writes the Washington Post of Muammar Gaddafi’s coastal hometown of around 100,000 residents.
Once considered to be a showpiece of urban development in Libya, Sirte has been the target of NATO bombing and NTC attacks since shortly after the fall of Tripoli in late August. In the last ten days, it has been the object of an intensified offensive. The Post states that “the damage wreaked in Sirte raises the question of whether its residents will go quietly into the post-Gaddafi future—or retain a smouldering anger that could fuel an insurgency.”
The Telegraph in Britain, which backs Gaddafi’s ouster, nevertheless comments that Sirte, which once had “a brilliant panoply of university and hospitals,with a glittering seafront and a marble-lined conference centre to host leaders from around the world,” is now “a squalid ruin.”
“Rebel fighters gazing at the devastation concede it is difficult to see how much of it could ever be repaired and made habitable again,” it notes. “The shattered remains of housing blocks and the wreckage of once comfortable homes…are more reminiscent of the grimmest scenes from Grozny, towards the end of Russia’s bloody Chechen war, than of anything seen in Libya so far. And the area around the grid of streets where anything between 200 and 500 loyalists are still holding out have become a killing ground, with loyalists, civilians and forces of the new Libyan government dying by the day.”
Former residents who have returned “found almost every house and building either damaged by a rocket or mortar, burned out or riddled with bullets. Water floods the streets and the city’s infrastructure is in tatters,” writes Reuters.
These events shatter the pretences on which the NATO war against Libya was launched—i.e. claims thatthe possibility that Gaddafi might carry out mass reprisals against protesters justified a NATO intervention to disarm him. Far from planning reprisals against defenceless protesters, the Libyan army soon faced a war in which they were outclassed by NATO forces intervening to support the “rebels.”Reports from Sirte now suggest that the NTC forces are now carrying out collective punishment in the city.
Reuters comments: “the ferociousness of the bombardment of Sirte and the burning of homes that belong to Gaddafi family members and supporters has raised suspicions that some fighters loyal to the NTC are looking for reprisals.” It cited residents returning to Sirte and accusing NTC fighters “of demolishing and looting homes, shops and public buildings.”
“They envy and hate us because Muammar is from here. But we are just civilians. The revolutionaries are coming here for revenge and destruction,” said a Sirte resident.
Another resident, Abu Anas, states: “What’s happening in Sirte is revenge, not liberation. When someone comes and takes your personal car and destroys your home, this is not liberation.”
NTC forces “clearly feel no need for restraint in bombarding the Gaddafi loyalists. That’s especially true of the many fighters from Misurata, a city to the west scarred by a bloody siege by Gaddafi’s troops in the spring,” the Post comments.
Numerous reports indicate that the NTC forces are looting the town.“Orders from the National Transitional Council to outlaw looting have done nothing to deter the rebel stragglers gutting abandoned buildings,” the Telegraph states.
Reuters reporters saw NTC fighters “roaming the streets of Sirte with chairs, tyres and computers on the backs of their pickup trucks. Brand new BMW and Toyota cars were seen being driven away by the fighters and being towed outside of the city.”
Associated Press reporters “also saw trucks carrying equipment from Sirte’s airport, including red-carpeted mobile staircases, baggage carts, airplane towing vehicles and security screening equipment, all apparently meant for Misurata’s badly damaged airport. Smaller pickups were loaded with rugs, freezers, refrigerators, furniture and other household goods, apparently taken by civilians LINK FOR REST
Alex Jones Infowars PrisonPlanet Peter Schiff Ron Paul Gerald Celente Max Keiser Bob Chapman Lew Rockwell
Libya War Lies – Worse Than Iraq – Video – Thomas Mountain
Rebel Militias Include the Human Traffickers of Benghazi
Libya : What Al Jazeera and CNN did not tell you
Ghaddafi and the truth about the war in Libya
The truth about the Libyan leader
HUGE PRO GADDAFI RALLY in Tripoli – Raw Footage
Translation of Gaddafi speech today, translation by Karim Budabuss: The leader is talking now. He is saying that this is a historical day, and he is challenging Sarkozy, Cameron and Obama to switch on their TVs and watch the crowds and he is saying that they will find out that they are delusional because they entered a war which they never win, he also says if you continue targeting our houses we can do the same coz Europe is not far away but he said lets not do this and watch the crowds , kids and women. They are not here because i ordered them to, it is they are free will. in this war you are not facing me you are facing these crowds. I am nothing, if you want peace with Libyans, it is up to the crowds. If you want any thing , negotiate with the crowds. The regime is not Gaddafi regime, it is a Libyan regime . Even if many got scared, defected and escaped, the Libyans will remain, and each coward will be replaced with a hero. Is it a democracy to bomb the civilians, we don’t want a democracy which comes with bombs. The socialist Jamahyria will win, the real democracy which serves the people. I advice you to stop bombing, and stop becoming mercenaries for some rebels. The Libyans said their words, they marched, their tribes made it clear that the future is for Libyans, the oil is for Libya, Libya is ours. You are delusional, a group of traitors convinced you that Libya is easy to get, you hired mercenaries , propaganda, psychological war all that didn’t allow you to make any progress on the ground. Turn on your TVs and watch the longest Libyan flag 4.5 km, I didn’t make this flag, people donated to make this flag. Those rebels are no different from who betrayed Libyan during the Italian invasion. Libyan people go in millions without weapons to liberate the regions under rebel control. You Libyan people are the only one who can finish this war with a victory. If they want to negotiate we welcome that, otherwise we are continuing and they are definitely losing no matter how many weapons they drop with parachute to the rebels. We will not betrayed our history nor our children and their future. The glory is for you brave Libyans, the struggle will continue.
- Tajoura: Tajoura last night near Nachie, clashes between rebels soar.
- Benghazi:Sources confirm the existence of secret prisons in the barracks of April 7, the Libyan leader and another in the region Koufya in Benghazi. Many prisoners remain in the majority of prisoners are from the south and west of Libya and especially the city of Sirte, the tribe of Kdadfa.
These Libyans were arrested on the day of the fall of Sirte. These prisons are run by militia extremists who deny the presence of house arrest. The detainees are mistreated. Their families asked hover, but no one moves.
- The beast “rebels” traitor looted the house of Musa Kusa,the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Muammar Gaddafi, who defected to flee to London, which became a key informant NATO / Qatar / NTC. As a reminder, Musa Kusa, it is still protected by the kingdom of Qatar.
- Tripoli:the beasts “rebels” are cowed and become more violent,very close monitoring of El Fateh University in Tripoliafter the leaflets demanding the return of Green Libya’s, were distributed in large numbers in college. This is the first time that such brochures are distributed to college.
Since yesterday, the rebels have increased their numbers within the university and trucks mounted with heavy weapons are there to deter any event.
- Sabha:gunmen in a car fired on mercenaries “rebels” of the NTC-NATO at the center of Sabha. Other rebels have tried to stop the car but they escaped.
- Sirte: Green Resistance warns young Libya’s Sirte to be careful because bands of mercenaries are at a checkpoint No. 50 to prevent young people. This morning they arrested two youths for no reason Sirte.
- Ajeelat: The Green Strength has distributed brochures to all the Libyans that the Resistance continues to recover land from the clutches of the Libyan mercenaries and traitors.
- Sabratha:They raised Green flags and pictures of the leader at the center of the city of Sabratha and young people doing their work hours and Antdharon decision and to God what I’m saying a martyr.
- Exclusive: Libya’s Civil Enforcement worries defenders of democracy
Thenewlaws of the military rulers to stifle pro-democracy organizations and “organize” the media. Jamie Dettmer reports on signs of trouble in the run up to national elections.
- Zenten:beasts “rebels” will not release Saif al-Islam to receive a million and a half dollars …
- Ghadames:it has become a giant furnace to torture and burn the Tuareg tribe
The inhumane treatment of black prisoners by the rebels in Libya
Libyan civilians cruelly tortured by the beasts “rebels” of the NATO-NTC
- BRILLIANT! The truth about Libya, Gaddafi, and the Illuminati
- The Brother Leader Gaddafi addresses students at the University of Oxford:The brother leader for students at the University of Oxford in the colonial approach of China and the U.S., and the need for Africans to come together to stop both approaches.
- Canal GhaddafiSpeaks
- The terrorist who usurps the finance ministry admitted that “the rebels” are mercenaries:In an interview with Reuters, Ziglam Hassan, NTC rats finance minister said he wants to resign for “waste of public funds” in fact said that many rats are scamming their own rats receiving government through false information, much more money than previously agreed.
For example highlighted the fact that many rats said they needed money because they were injured, but then the NTC found out that rats of this kind were actually spending the money on luxury foreign hotels.
However, these payments are not limited to medical expenses of injured rats, but also to reward those mercenaries for crimes they committed against the Libyan army and the Libyan people. Once again NTC rats found to be cheated by its mercenaries.
He said that in 3 months NTChad to pay the “rebels” (rats) 1.8 billion of Libya which is the equivalent of 1.4 million U.S. dollars.
There is nothing new in sayingthat so-called “rebels”were just dirty mercenaries fighting for money andnot for “democracy” but the point is that now even now the amount (1.4 billion dollars)for These dirty rats destroyed one of the most beautifulcountries in the world.
WASHINGTON, DC – After French President Francois Hollande said in an interview on Tuesday hinted at an openness to military intervention in Syria, the question of whether NATO should intervene in the country Rattled violence has returned to the forefront. While there are clear differences between conflict in Libya and Syria, the 2012 Gallup data show pluralities in the Arab world opposed the NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, suggesting that similar measures in Syria could meet with disapproval considerably in the region.
The air campaign conducted by NATO forces against the government, which began in March 2011 ended seven months later, in a decisive victory for the rebel groups in NATO and Libya. The overthrow of 42 years old represented the third government of North Africa fell in 2011 amid riots in the Arab world and was the first in the region to receive military support from Western nations.
At least a plurality in nine Arab countries surveyed and the Somaliland region opposed the NATO intervention in Libya. Residents in several North African countries, including Morocco (12%), Egypt (13%) and Algeria (14%) were the least likely to say they were in favor of the NATO intervention. In Tunisia, where the region is successful revolution denounced publicly for the first time by the late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, attitudes were significantly more mixed (33% in favor versus 40% against).
For complete data sets or custom research over 150 countries Gallup continually surveys, pleasecontactSocialandEconomicAnalysis@gallup.comor call 202.715.3030 .
Survey Methodology
The results are based on face to face interviews with approximately 1,000 adults per country, over 15 years, conducted between February and April 2012. For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error ranges of ± percentage points from 3.3 to 3.7 percentage points ±. The margin of error reflects the influence of the weighting of the data. In addition to sampling error, the question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the results of public opinion polls.
It is necessary that men should understand things as they are, should call them by their right names, and should know that an army is an instrument for killing, and that the enrollment and management of an army...is a preparation for murder - Tolstoy
.jpg)
.jpg)
there will be another Military intervention .
.jpg)
