Islamist radicalism as a weapon of massive destabilization

by Nagham Salman, an expert on Middle East

Neologisms as ‘balkanization’, ‘Afghanize’ and ‘somalizar’ are already widely used by many international experts and analysts. And science is expected to create a new international political terminology as‘ iraquizar ‘,’ libianizar ‘,’ sudanizar ‘and‘ sirianizar ‘ , or even ‘ malinizar ‘ , all to reference creation processes mired in failed states chaos and in turn causing regional instability.

These concepts refer to a process of anarchy interested and instigated from abroad by the hegemonic powers, which are then offered to fix the mess within the upper echelons of international UN general. Thus, a profit selling weapons during the conflict and, subsequently, with the reconstruction of the country and the award of major infrastructure projects and extraction of oil in large international corporations during the supposed ‘transition to democracy’.

And all disputes relating to these concepts in turn have two common features and unmistakable: Islamic fundamentalism and international jihadism. Both are essential components of the strategy that was launched with the creation of Al Qaeda to fight in Afghanistan against Soviet expansion through Central Asia and into the Indian Ocean in the eighties of the last century.

The creation of the network that led Osama Bin Laden was financed by Saudi Arabia , and the training, weaponry, logistics and intelligence would be supplied by the CIA, as Hillary Clinton acknowledged in a  recent interview .

Mujahideen of Al Qaeda dragged the Soviet Union into a long war of attrition, which was comparable to Vietnam for America. Tomb of Empires eventually swamping the Red Army and its military failure would be a determining factor in the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the disappearance of the bipolar world that had governed international relations since the end of World War II.

After the success in Central Asia with an army of mercenaries recruited and radical fundamentalists throughout the Muslim world and trained in Pakistan, the Pentagon knew that this was a tactic that offered maximum benefit with minimal effort, in the sense that the savings on U.S. military casualties, concerns that have kept the successive occupants of the White House after the trauma of Vietnam, which killed thousands of American soldiers.

Thus, the same pattern was used for the Balkan wars in the nineties, when thousands of jihadists and weapons were brought from Turkey to Albania as a prelude to the disintegration of the former Yugoslavia. The wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as the long war in Chechnya, prompted through the Caucasus, were all conflicts whose purpose was to weaken the natural zone of Russian influence.

The consecration of the successful strategy of massive destabilization deepened after the  September 11th the terrorist attacks

Since then, many countries have been victims of international imperialism after finalization of the  “war on terror”  in 2001 at the Summit of the Azores, and engineering anglo zionist intelligence that aimed to maintain geoeconomic and geopolitical hegemony Global few over the rest.

The balance of this massive destabilization strategy during the last twelve years is bleak. In these times, we live in an uncertain world in which tens of interreligious and inter ethnic conflicts have been created or revitalized from Indonesia to Africa.

Today, Afghanistan has become a macro-NATO military base in the backyard of Russia and China, as Iraq, Syria and Egypt are embedded in political circumstances that could degenerate into an increasingly likely that cross-sectarian war between Shiites and Sunnis that would aim to eliminate Iran as a regional power in the Middle East .

Central Africa is currently back in the public eye, but many latent conflicts can be exploited over the globe at any time. The problem is that the strategy of massive destabilization may be charged a collateral victim unwanted and was never on the agenda. And that victim could become Western Europe where radical Islam has taken root.

Words like ‘massive sale of arms to opposition groups’, ‘funding conflict’, ‘external interference’, ‘outside intervention’, put makeup euphemistically by major international mass media. Subsequently presented as “humanitarian wars”, “war on terror”, “responsibility to protect” and “help the oppressed” as a result of which there are “collateral victims.” Regarding media coverage of such conflicts, information is cooked and served at the table by the same ‘lobbies’ who hold global power, in which the powers converge political, economic, military and media. At the top of the pyramid are the great magnates of international finance and some members of the Bilderberg Club, which pursues informal proto-world government. Many of the members of this elite club are great benchmarks of international Zionism, while great enemies of moderate Islam. radical Islamism, Salafism, and Al Qaeda Takfirism are relatively recent movements inspired by Wahhabism, which is the ideological pillar religious-fundamentalist Saudi monarchy. All characterized by their radicalism and religious fanaticism are cannon fodder for the CIA in particular and NATO in general. The perfect excuse to destabilize countries and then invade. Such ideologies fade into hundreds of groups and factions without central direction, which are funded with petrodollars especially Qataris and Saudis when initiated destabilization campaigns and during the course of subsequent conflicts. Many of these groups continue to be paid to the trafficking of arms, drugs and people in times of relative calm. Extremist groups can be created in any country with Muslim populations from Indonesia, Philippines and China to Indochina, including southern Russia Caucasus and the Balkans, to Africa and even Central and Western Europe coming. It is only necessary to send radical imams, usually educated in Saudi Arabia, using a speech based on hatred and intolerance. A speech that appeals to young people from the poorest classes of society, which may be subsequently induced to destabilize their own country or travel to where they are in condition jihadists claim on payment of large sums of money and a promise of eternal paradise. exist in many sleeper cells that can be activated at any time, and many of its members can be mobilized wherever unclaimed for holy war, as happened recently in Libya , Syria and Mali .

Parallel to the concepts mentioned above, many analysts have recently been using the term Zion-jihadism, which refers to the idea that the more radical is the Arab and Muslim world (regional war Shi’ism and Sunnism ) in general and Palestine in particular more sympathy and religious legitimacy wins the State of Israel, devoid of historical and political legitimacy by being artificially created barely sixty years ago with the expulsion of a native population of the land. Thus, the State of Israel benefits of radicalism Islamist in the sense that while the world is watching “Islamist savages” and caused a possible war between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, the “only democracy in the Middle East” may continue to occupy more Palestinian and impunity undergoing a ‘ apartheid ‘intolerable for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Some theories agree that a great war between Shiites and Sunnis would destroy the entire Middle East region and pave the way for the consolidation history and geography of Israel. In another sense, the Islamist radicalism can be considered the greatest enemy of Islam and even the Palestinian cause, while the main cause of strengthening an international Islamophobia detriment of the vast majority of moderate Muslims. In what is certain is that this stage will be remembered as the darkest historical period of the Arab and Muslim, Christian and off for the period of the religious wars and the Inquisition in Europe.

source: actualidad.rt.com/expertos/nagham_salman/